PRESERVING THE PAST TO DESIGN THE FUTURE READING, INTERPRETING AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH ARCHIVES

E. Cianfanelli
{"title":"PRESERVING THE PAST TO DESIGN THE FUTURE READING, INTERPRETING AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH ARCHIVES","authors":"E. Cianfanelli","doi":"10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2018/5.3/S21.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diffusion and development of digital technologies had radically changed the way in which museums and cultural institutions offer content to the public. In this regard, the academic field has been discussed about the connection between the Design discipline and Cultural Heritage for several years; this is due to the profound transformations faced in both Design and Cultural Heritage areas. Through the description of two different projects we intend to highlight the problem of technology, which does not represent a solution to all the concerns about archives, protection, use and enhancement of the Artworks, on the contrary it represents an instrument and, as such, it should have empowering and emancipating capabilities. In particular, this contribution will describe the activities of the research team aimed at 3D digitization of the Tribuna degli Uffizi in Florence, and of two Egyptian Sarcophagi belonging to the Musées Royaux d'Art et d’Histoire in Brussells. The paper wants to emphasize the contrast between the \"partial failure\" of the Uffizi Tribune project, whose model did not produce any relevant result regarding knowledge and dissemination; in relation to the Sarcophagi project in which the digitization has been interpreted as a tool for enhancing and spread the knowledge contents discovered during the restoration. Comparisons between these two projects have given way to this reflection concerning the digitized heritage and consequently the nature and potentials of digital archives. Archives should be containers of information and knowledge ready to be activated for social and cultural purposes. As a system of knowledge open to multiple uses, reuses and interpretations (Sennet 2008), the archive allows both synchronic and diachronic actions for the narration of memories. The design process in this context can develop projects for different cultural experiences in order to foster the inclusive dimension of historical/artistic assets through archives. Through","PeriodicalId":222805,"journal":{"name":"5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Urban Planning, Architecture and Design","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Urban Planning, Architecture and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2018/5.3/S21.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diffusion and development of digital technologies had radically changed the way in which museums and cultural institutions offer content to the public. In this regard, the academic field has been discussed about the connection between the Design discipline and Cultural Heritage for several years; this is due to the profound transformations faced in both Design and Cultural Heritage areas. Through the description of two different projects we intend to highlight the problem of technology, which does not represent a solution to all the concerns about archives, protection, use and enhancement of the Artworks, on the contrary it represents an instrument and, as such, it should have empowering and emancipating capabilities. In particular, this contribution will describe the activities of the research team aimed at 3D digitization of the Tribuna degli Uffizi in Florence, and of two Egyptian Sarcophagi belonging to the Musées Royaux d'Art et d’Histoire in Brussells. The paper wants to emphasize the contrast between the "partial failure" of the Uffizi Tribune project, whose model did not produce any relevant result regarding knowledge and dissemination; in relation to the Sarcophagi project in which the digitization has been interpreted as a tool for enhancing and spread the knowledge contents discovered during the restoration. Comparisons between these two projects have given way to this reflection concerning the digitized heritage and consequently the nature and potentials of digital archives. Archives should be containers of information and knowledge ready to be activated for social and cultural purposes. As a system of knowledge open to multiple uses, reuses and interpretations (Sennet 2008), the archive allows both synchronic and diachronic actions for the narration of memories. The design process in this context can develop projects for different cultural experiences in order to foster the inclusive dimension of historical/artistic assets through archives. Through
保存过去,设计未来通过档案阅读,解释和传递知识
数字技术的传播和发展从根本上改变了博物馆和文化机构向公众提供内容的方式。在这方面,学术界多年来一直在讨论设计学科与文化遗产之间的联系;这是由于设计和文化遗产领域都面临着深刻的变革。通过对两个不同项目的描述,我们想要强调技术的问题,技术并不代表所有关于艺术品档案、保护、使用和提升的问题的解决方案,相反,它代表了一种工具,因此,它应该具有赋权和解放的能力。特别是,这篇文章将描述研究小组的活动,旨在对佛罗伦萨的乌菲齐论坛进行3D数字化,以及对布鲁塞尔皇家艺术和历史博物馆的两个埃及石棺进行数字化。本文想强调的对比是:乌菲齐论坛报项目的“部分失败”,其模型在知识和传播方面没有产生任何相关的结果;在石棺项目中,数字化被解释为增强和传播在修复过程中发现的知识内容的工具。这两个项目之间的比较已经让位于对数字化遗产的反思,因此数字档案的性质和潜力。档案应该是随时为社会和文化目的而激活的信息和知识的容器。作为一个开放的知识系统,多种用途,重用和解释(Sennet 2008),档案允许共时和历时的行动来叙述记忆。在这种背景下,设计过程可以为不同的文化体验开发项目,以通过档案促进历史/艺术资产的包容性。通过
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信