The Role of Informal Institutions in the Enforcement of Rules and How to Improve Corporate and Public Governance in Brazil: Studies Based on a Set of Corporate Governance Cases Involving State-Owned Companies

Alexandre Coelho
{"title":"The Role of Informal Institutions in the Enforcement of Rules and How to Improve Corporate and Public Governance in Brazil: Studies Based on a Set of Corporate Governance Cases Involving State-Owned Companies","authors":"Alexandre Coelho","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3434037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to evaluate how informal institutions affect the formal ones and how legal proposals may improve both corporate governance and public administration. Through a set of corporate governance cases, especially the recent cases on Petrobras, the state-owned company involved in accusations of illegal bribery and corruption schemes, we examine how minority shareholders’ protection rules are affected by informal institutions, such as political and social norms. After that, this paper points out the institutional proposals that policymakers, academics, and organizations are recommending to improve corporate governance in Brazil and how such institutional mechanisms may also be useful in public governance. It concludes that the state, reinforced by informal institutions and acting as the controlling shareholder of companies such as Petrobras, has been a leading player in the expropriation of minority shareholders’ rights in Brazil. Moreover, its actions have also caused economic and social problems for the stakeholders of the state-owned companies, mainly suppliers and workers. Finally, the author further believes that the outcome of the interaction between formal and informal institutions in corporate and public governance is under-researched in Brazil. Hence, to promote its social and economic development, this interaction between institutions must be studied in greater depth, and, consequently, its negative effects can be minimized through better institutional design.","PeriodicalId":343804,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate how informal institutions affect the formal ones and how legal proposals may improve both corporate governance and public administration. Through a set of corporate governance cases, especially the recent cases on Petrobras, the state-owned company involved in accusations of illegal bribery and corruption schemes, we examine how minority shareholders’ protection rules are affected by informal institutions, such as political and social norms. After that, this paper points out the institutional proposals that policymakers, academics, and organizations are recommending to improve corporate governance in Brazil and how such institutional mechanisms may also be useful in public governance. It concludes that the state, reinforced by informal institutions and acting as the controlling shareholder of companies such as Petrobras, has been a leading player in the expropriation of minority shareholders’ rights in Brazil. Moreover, its actions have also caused economic and social problems for the stakeholders of the state-owned companies, mainly suppliers and workers. Finally, the author further believes that the outcome of the interaction between formal and informal institutions in corporate and public governance is under-researched in Brazil. Hence, to promote its social and economic development, this interaction between institutions must be studied in greater depth, and, consequently, its negative effects can be minimized through better institutional design.
非正式制度在规则执行中的作用以及如何改善巴西的公司治理和公共治理:基于一组涉及国有公司的公司治理案例的研究
本文旨在评估非正式制度如何影响正式制度,以及法律建议如何改善公司治理和公共管理。通过一系列公司治理案例,特别是巴西国家石油公司(Petrobras)最近卷入非法贿赂和腐败计划指控的案例,我们研究了政治和社会规范等非正式制度如何影响小股东保护规则。然后,本文指出了决策者、学者和组织为改善巴西公司治理而建议的制度建议,以及这些制度机制如何在公共治理中发挥作用。报告得出的结论是,在非正式机构的支持下,作为巴西国家石油公司(Petrobras)等公司的控股股东,巴西政府一直是剥夺巴西少数股东权利的主要参与者。此外,它的行为也给国有企业的利益相关者,主要是供应商和工人造成了经济和社会问题。最后,作者进一步认为,巴西对公司和公共治理中正式和非正式制度之间相互作用的结果研究不足。因此,为了促进其社会和经济发展,必须更深入地研究制度之间的这种相互作用,从而通过更好的制度设计将其负面影响降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信