Temporal reasoning in a meta constraint logic programming architecture

E. Lamma, P. Mello, M. Milano
{"title":"Temporal reasoning in a meta constraint logic programming architecture","authors":"E. Lamma, P. Mello, M. Milano","doi":"10.1109/TIME.1996.555691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a powerful programming paradigm combining the advantages of Logic Programming and the efficiency of constraint solving. However, CLP presents some limitations in dealing with temporal reasoning. First, it uses an \"arc consistency\" propagation algorithm which cannot be changed by the user and it is too weak in many temporal frameworks. Second, CLP is not able to deal with qualitative temporal constraints. In this paper, we show how to overcome these limitations. In particular, we present a way of performing a path-consistency check without changing the propagation algorithm of the constraint solver. In addition, we show how to integrate qualitative and quantitative temporal reasoning by using a two module meta CLP architecture. Each module is a finite domain constraint solver (CLP(FD)). The object system (extended with the path-consistency algorithm) performs quantitative reasoning, while the meta-level reasons on constraints of the underlying system thus performing qualitative reasoning. In this way, we can benefit of the efficiency of the constraint handling mechanism of CLP and the modularity, flexibility and scalability of meta-architectures.","PeriodicalId":259291,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Third International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME '96)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Third International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME '96)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.1996.555691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a powerful programming paradigm combining the advantages of Logic Programming and the efficiency of constraint solving. However, CLP presents some limitations in dealing with temporal reasoning. First, it uses an "arc consistency" propagation algorithm which cannot be changed by the user and it is too weak in many temporal frameworks. Second, CLP is not able to deal with qualitative temporal constraints. In this paper, we show how to overcome these limitations. In particular, we present a way of performing a path-consistency check without changing the propagation algorithm of the constraint solver. In addition, we show how to integrate qualitative and quantitative temporal reasoning by using a two module meta CLP architecture. Each module is a finite domain constraint solver (CLP(FD)). The object system (extended with the path-consistency algorithm) performs quantitative reasoning, while the meta-level reasons on constraints of the underlying system thus performing qualitative reasoning. In this way, we can benefit of the efficiency of the constraint handling mechanism of CLP and the modularity, flexibility and scalability of meta-architectures.
元约束逻辑编程体系结构中的时间推理
约束逻辑规划(CLP)是一种强大的编程范式,它结合了逻辑规划的优点和约束求解的效率。然而,CLP在处理时间推理方面存在一些局限性。首先,它使用了一种用户无法改变的“弧一致性”传播算法,在许多时间框架中太弱。其次,CLP无法处理定性的时间约束。在本文中,我们将展示如何克服这些限制。特别地,我们提出了一种在不改变约束求解器的传播算法的情况下执行路径一致性检查的方法。此外,我们还展示了如何通过使用两个模块元CLP架构来集成定性和定量时间推理。每个模块都是一个有限域约束求解器(CLP(FD))。对象系统(用路径一致性算法扩展)执行定量推理,而元级对底层系统的约束进行推理,从而执行定性推理。这样,我们可以受益于CLP约束处理机制的效率和元体系结构的模块化、灵活性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信