BERTOLT BRECHT AND HELMUT BAIERL: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL INTERPRETATION.

O. Ankhym, M. Ankhym
{"title":"BERTOLT BRECHT AND HELMUT BAIERL: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL INTERPRETATION.","authors":"O. Ankhym, M. Ankhym","doi":"10.35433/brecht.8.2022.7-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Helmut Baierl with his unique dramaturgy, special methods and ways of depicting reality was subjected to numerous criticisms and became one of the most controversial creative personalities in post-war Germany. His plays caused discussions not only in the GDR and FRG but also beyond their borders. There is still no unanimous opinion among literary critics about this playwright and his significance for drama. Some scholars call him an epigone of Bertolt Brecht, others call him a follower, then there are those who consider him an innovator, etc. Therefore, taking into account the unreflected artistic experience of this dramatist in modern literary studies, as well as his pronounced creative dialogue with B. Brecht, the article aims to give an objective assessment of H. Baierl's work and trace the playwright's implementation of the main principles of epic theatre. H. Baierl’s work with its inherent synthesis of theoretical and creative interpretations confirms the conclusion that creative writing is a dialogue of one artist with another one/ ones which results in a creative and / or theoretical interpretation of the works of the latter one / ones. \nConsiderable attention is paid to H. Baierl’s theoretical and practical (creative) interpretation of works by B. Brecht. It is stated that H. Baierl’s works, presented as a plurality of creative interpretation models of different levels with certain inherent elements of parody / stylization based on their pretexts, are a synthesis of a theoretical interpretation of B. Brecht’s ideas and a creative interpretation of his plays. H. Baierl not only continues the dramaturgical traditions of the master, but also adopts his characters in a certain way, tells their stories further, tracking them under other socio-historical circumstances. A comparison of the plays of both playwrights and their theoretical works shows a kinship in views on the purpose and aim of drama, as well as a community of ideological and aesthetic principles.","PeriodicalId":266292,"journal":{"name":"Brecht-Magazine: Articles, Essays, Translations","volume":"275 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brecht-Magazine: Articles, Essays, Translations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35433/brecht.8.2022.7-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Helmut Baierl with his unique dramaturgy, special methods and ways of depicting reality was subjected to numerous criticisms and became one of the most controversial creative personalities in post-war Germany. His plays caused discussions not only in the GDR and FRG but also beyond their borders. There is still no unanimous opinion among literary critics about this playwright and his significance for drama. Some scholars call him an epigone of Bertolt Brecht, others call him a follower, then there are those who consider him an innovator, etc. Therefore, taking into account the unreflected artistic experience of this dramatist in modern literary studies, as well as his pronounced creative dialogue with B. Brecht, the article aims to give an objective assessment of H. Baierl's work and trace the playwright's implementation of the main principles of epic theatre. H. Baierl’s work with its inherent synthesis of theoretical and creative interpretations confirms the conclusion that creative writing is a dialogue of one artist with another one/ ones which results in a creative and / or theoretical interpretation of the works of the latter one / ones. Considerable attention is paid to H. Baierl’s theoretical and practical (creative) interpretation of works by B. Brecht. It is stated that H. Baierl’s works, presented as a plurality of creative interpretation models of different levels with certain inherent elements of parody / stylization based on their pretexts, are a synthesis of a theoretical interpretation of B. Brecht’s ideas and a creative interpretation of his plays. H. Baierl not only continues the dramaturgical traditions of the master, but also adopts his characters in a certain way, tells their stories further, tracking them under other socio-historical circumstances. A comparison of the plays of both playwrights and their theoretical works shows a kinship in views on the purpose and aim of drama, as well as a community of ideological and aesthetic principles.
贝托尔特·布莱希特和赫尔穆特·拜尔:理论与实践的解释。
赫尔穆特·拜尔以其独特的戏剧手法、独特的描绘现实的方法和方式受到了无数的批评,成为战后德国最具争议的创作人物之一。他的戏剧不仅在德意志民主共和国和德意志联邦共和国引起了讨论,而且还在国界之外引起了讨论。对于这位剧作家及其对戏剧的意义,文学评论界至今仍未形成一致的看法。一些学者称他为贝托尔特·布莱希特的追随者,另一些学者称他为追随者,还有一些人认为他是创新者,等等。因此,考虑到这位剧作家在现代文学研究中未被反映出来的艺术经验,以及他与布莱希特之间明显的创造性对话,本文旨在对H.拜尔的作品进行客观评价,并追溯这位剧作家对史诗戏剧主要原则的实施。H. Baierl的作品及其内在的理论和创造性解释的综合证实了这样一个结论:创造性写作是一个艺术家与另一个艺术家的对话,结果是对后者的作品进行创造性和/或理论解释。贝勒对布莱希特作品的理论和实践(创造性)解释引起了相当大的关注。本文认为,贝勒的作品是对布莱希特思想的理论解释和对其戏剧的创造性解释的综合,是多种不同层次的创造性解释模式,在其借口的基础上具有一定的戏仿/风格化的内在因素。H. Baierl不仅延续了大师的戏剧传统,还以某种方式采用了他的人物,进一步讲述了他们的故事,将他们置于其他社会历史环境中。比较两位剧作家的戏剧和他们的理论著作,可以看出他们对戏剧的目的和目的的看法是相似的,在思想和美学原则上是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信