Machine and Deep Learning Based Comparative Analysis Using Hybrid Approaches for Intrusion Detection System

A. Rashid, M. Siddique, S. Ahmed
{"title":"Machine and Deep Learning Based Comparative Analysis Using Hybrid Approaches for Intrusion Detection System","authors":"A. Rashid, M. Siddique, S. Ahmed","doi":"10.1109/ICACS47775.2020.9055946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intrusion detection is one of the most prominent and challenging problem faced by cybersecurity organizations. Intrusion Detection System (IDS) plays a vital role in identifying network security threats. It protects the network for vulnerable source code, viruses, worms and unauthorized intruders for many intranet/internet applications. Despite many open source APIs and tools for intrusion detection, there are still many network security problems exist. These problems are handled through the proper pre-processing, normalization, feature selection and ranking on benchmark dataset attributes prior to the enforcement of self-learning-based classification algorithms. In this paper, we have performed a comprehensive comparative analysis of the benchmark datasets NSL-KDD and CIDDS-001. For getting optimal results, we have used the hybrid feature selection and ranking methods before applying self-learning (Machine / Deep Learning) classification algorithmic approaches such as SVM, Naïve Bayes, k-NN, Neural Networks, DNN and DAE. We have analyzed the performance of IDS through some prominent performance indicator metrics such as Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1-Score. The experimental results show that k-NN, SVM, NN and DNN classifiers perform approx. 100% accuracy regarding performance evaluation metrics on the NSL-KDD dataset whereas k-NN and Naïve Bayes classifiers perform approx. 99% accuracy on the CIDDS-001 dataset.","PeriodicalId":268675,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACS47775.2020.9055946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Intrusion detection is one of the most prominent and challenging problem faced by cybersecurity organizations. Intrusion Detection System (IDS) plays a vital role in identifying network security threats. It protects the network for vulnerable source code, viruses, worms and unauthorized intruders for many intranet/internet applications. Despite many open source APIs and tools for intrusion detection, there are still many network security problems exist. These problems are handled through the proper pre-processing, normalization, feature selection and ranking on benchmark dataset attributes prior to the enforcement of self-learning-based classification algorithms. In this paper, we have performed a comprehensive comparative analysis of the benchmark datasets NSL-KDD and CIDDS-001. For getting optimal results, we have used the hybrid feature selection and ranking methods before applying self-learning (Machine / Deep Learning) classification algorithmic approaches such as SVM, Naïve Bayes, k-NN, Neural Networks, DNN and DAE. We have analyzed the performance of IDS through some prominent performance indicator metrics such as Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1-Score. The experimental results show that k-NN, SVM, NN and DNN classifiers perform approx. 100% accuracy regarding performance evaluation metrics on the NSL-KDD dataset whereas k-NN and Naïve Bayes classifiers perform approx. 99% accuracy on the CIDDS-001 dataset.
基于机器和深度学习的入侵检测系统混合方法比较分析
入侵检测是网络安全组织面临的最突出和最具挑战性的问题之一。入侵检测系统(IDS)在识别网络安全威胁方面起着至关重要的作用。它保护网络易受攻击的源代码,病毒,蠕虫和未经授权的入侵者为许多内部网/互联网应用程序。尽管有许多开源的api和工具用于入侵检测,但仍然存在许多网络安全问题。这些问题是通过适当的预处理、归一化、特征选择和对基准数据集属性的排序来处理的,然后再执行基于自学习的分类算法。在本文中,我们对基准数据集NSL-KDD和CIDDS-001进行了全面的比较分析。为了获得最佳结果,我们在应用自学习(机器/深度学习)分类算法方法(如SVM, Naïve Bayes, k-NN, Neural Networks, DNN和DAE)之前使用了混合特征选择和排序方法。我们通过一些突出的性能指标指标(如Accuracy、Precision、Recall和F1-Score)分析了IDS的性能。实验结果表明,k-NN、SVM、NN和DNN分类器都能达到近似的分类效果。NSL-KDD数据集的性能评估指标准确率为100%,而k-NN和Naïve贝叶斯分类器的准确率约为100%。在CIDDS-001数据集上的准确率为99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信