Collective Intelligence Systems from an Organizational Perspective

D. Draheim
{"title":"Collective Intelligence Systems from an Organizational Perspective","authors":"D. Draheim","doi":"10.1145/3366030.3368457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this talk, we consider Collective Intelligence (CI) systems [11-13, 15] from an organizational perspective. CI systems offer a solution to problems that need cognitive skills, problem-solving capabilities, knowledge, know-how or experience at large scale. They help to facilitate and streamline large-scale problem-solving endeavours. The organizational perspective on CI systems offers us two strands of discussion. On the one hand, it can be about understanding the potential of CI systems for today's organizations. On the other hand, CI systems can be considered as organizations themselves and can be investigated as such. We start by reviewing the state-of-the art of CI frameworks [19, 20]. What are the essential building blocks of a CI system? Who uses them? For what, how and why? We come up with a generalized framework [19] that serves us as a basis for further investigations. From a governance perspective, today's organizations are recursive-feedback control systems, usually expressed in the form of process-oriented management [5, 9, 10], see also [6, 7]. A deeper look reveals a plethora of different styles of organizational culture [14, 18]. Still, viable organizations have in common certain essential sub systems, which are policy making, external and internal steering, the primary activities and an informational backbone [1-3]. How can we exploit CI systems to support these organizational building blocks? Can CI systems be made an integral part of organizations to make them more stable towards distortions; more adaptive towards an ever changing environment; more agile towards the organization's innovative potential? Answers to such questions would free CI systems from being niche players in certain large-scale problem-solving initiatives. Reflecting back from the potential of CI systems in today's organizations, we ask: what can be learned with respect to the design and implementation of future CI systems; and: how to break the silos, i.e., how to integrate CI systems with related paradigms such as knowledge management systems, compare also with [4, 8, 16, 17] and latest computing resources such as big data and the data science toolkit?","PeriodicalId":446280,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3366030.3368457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this talk, we consider Collective Intelligence (CI) systems [11-13, 15] from an organizational perspective. CI systems offer a solution to problems that need cognitive skills, problem-solving capabilities, knowledge, know-how or experience at large scale. They help to facilitate and streamline large-scale problem-solving endeavours. The organizational perspective on CI systems offers us two strands of discussion. On the one hand, it can be about understanding the potential of CI systems for today's organizations. On the other hand, CI systems can be considered as organizations themselves and can be investigated as such. We start by reviewing the state-of-the art of CI frameworks [19, 20]. What are the essential building blocks of a CI system? Who uses them? For what, how and why? We come up with a generalized framework [19] that serves us as a basis for further investigations. From a governance perspective, today's organizations are recursive-feedback control systems, usually expressed in the form of process-oriented management [5, 9, 10], see also [6, 7]. A deeper look reveals a plethora of different styles of organizational culture [14, 18]. Still, viable organizations have in common certain essential sub systems, which are policy making, external and internal steering, the primary activities and an informational backbone [1-3]. How can we exploit CI systems to support these organizational building blocks? Can CI systems be made an integral part of organizations to make them more stable towards distortions; more adaptive towards an ever changing environment; more agile towards the organization's innovative potential? Answers to such questions would free CI systems from being niche players in certain large-scale problem-solving initiatives. Reflecting back from the potential of CI systems in today's organizations, we ask: what can be learned with respect to the design and implementation of future CI systems; and: how to break the silos, i.e., how to integrate CI systems with related paradigms such as knowledge management systems, compare also with [4, 8, 16, 17] and latest computing resources such as big data and the data science toolkit?
组织视角下的集体智慧系统
在这次演讲中,我们从组织的角度考虑集体智能(CI)系统[11- 13,15]。CI系统为需要大规模认知技能、解决问题的能力、知识、诀窍或经验的问题提供解决方案。它们有助于促进和简化大规模解决问题的努力。从组织角度来看,CI系统为我们提供了两种讨论方式。一方面,它可以是关于理解CI系统对当今组织的潜力。另一方面,CI系统可以被视为组织本身,并且可以作为组织来研究。我们首先回顾CI框架的最新进展[19,20]。CI系统的基本构建块是什么?谁在使用它们?为什么,怎么做,为什么?我们提出了一个广义的框架[19],作为我们进一步研究的基础。从治理的角度来看,今天的组织是递归反馈控制系统,通常以面向过程的管理的形式表达[5,9,10],参见[6,7]。更深入的研究揭示了组织文化的大量不同风格[14,18]。尽管如此,可行的组织仍然有一些共同的基本子系统,它们是政策制定、外部和内部指导、主要活动和信息骨干[1-3]。我们如何利用CI系统来支持这些组织构建块?CI系统能否成为组织的一个组成部分,使其在面对扭曲时更加稳定?更能适应不断变化的环境;对组织的创新潜力更敏捷?这些问题的答案将使CI系统免于成为某些大规模问题解决计划中的利基参与者。回顾CI系统在当今组织中的潜力,我们的问题是:关于未来CI系统的设计和实施,我们可以学到什么;以及:如何打破孤岛,即如何将CI系统与相关范例(如知识管理系统)集成,并与[4,8,16,17]和最新的计算资源(如大数据和数据科学工具包)进行比较?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信