Economic Capital and the Aggregation of Risks Using Copulas

Andrew Tang, Emiliano A. Valdez
{"title":"Economic Capital and the Aggregation of Risks Using Copulas","authors":"Andrew Tang, Emiliano A. Valdez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1347675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insurance companies measure and manage capital across a broad range of diverse business products. Thus there is a need for the aggregation of the losses from the various business lines whose risk distributions vary. Risk dependencies between losses from different business lines have long been recognised in the insurance industry as integral factors driving the insurer's aggregate loss process. However, in the past, there has been limited attempt at adequately modelling the dependence structure to be factored in the aggregation process for capital determination purposes. The current industry standard is to solely use linear correlations to describe the dependence structure. While being computationally convenient and straightforward to understand, linear correlations fail to capture all the dependence structure that exist between losses from multiple business lines. Other more general dependence modelling techniques such as copulas have become popular recently. In this paper, we address the issue of the aggregation of risks using copula models. Copulas can be used to construct joint multivariate distributions of the losses and provide a rather flexible and realistic model of allowing for the dependence structure, while separating the effects of peculiar characteristics of the marginal distributions such as thickness of tails. This modelling structure allows us to explore the impact of dependencies of risks on the total required economic capital. Using numerical illustrations based on Australian general insurance data, the sensitivities of the capital requirement to the choice of the copula and other modelling assumptions are investigated. The related issue of the diversification benefit from operating multiple business lines in the context of aggregation of risks by copulas is also explored. The key conclusion is that there is a large variation in the capital requirement as well as diversification benefit under different copula assumptions. The results of this paper serve as a reminder to actuaries and other industry practitioners of the significance of choosing an appropriate aggregation model for capital purposes.","PeriodicalId":315176,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1347675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

Insurance companies measure and manage capital across a broad range of diverse business products. Thus there is a need for the aggregation of the losses from the various business lines whose risk distributions vary. Risk dependencies between losses from different business lines have long been recognised in the insurance industry as integral factors driving the insurer's aggregate loss process. However, in the past, there has been limited attempt at adequately modelling the dependence structure to be factored in the aggregation process for capital determination purposes. The current industry standard is to solely use linear correlations to describe the dependence structure. While being computationally convenient and straightforward to understand, linear correlations fail to capture all the dependence structure that exist between losses from multiple business lines. Other more general dependence modelling techniques such as copulas have become popular recently. In this paper, we address the issue of the aggregation of risks using copula models. Copulas can be used to construct joint multivariate distributions of the losses and provide a rather flexible and realistic model of allowing for the dependence structure, while separating the effects of peculiar characteristics of the marginal distributions such as thickness of tails. This modelling structure allows us to explore the impact of dependencies of risks on the total required economic capital. Using numerical illustrations based on Australian general insurance data, the sensitivities of the capital requirement to the choice of the copula and other modelling assumptions are investigated. The related issue of the diversification benefit from operating multiple business lines in the context of aggregation of risks by copulas is also explored. The key conclusion is that there is a large variation in the capital requirement as well as diversification benefit under different copula assumptions. The results of this paper serve as a reminder to actuaries and other industry practitioners of the significance of choosing an appropriate aggregation model for capital purposes.
经济资本与copula的风险聚集
保险公司衡量和管理各种不同业务产品的资本。因此,有必要汇总风险分布不同的各种业务线的损失。不同业务线损失之间的风险依赖关系长期以来一直被保险业视为驱动保险公司总损失过程的不可或缺的因素。然而,在过去,为了确定资本的目的,对在汇总过程中考虑的依赖结构进行充分建模的尝试有限。目前的行业标准是单独使用线性相关性来描述依赖结构。虽然线性相关性在计算上方便且易于理解,但它无法捕获多个业务线损失之间存在的所有依赖结构。其他更普遍的依赖性建模技术,如copula,最近也变得流行起来。在本文中,我们使用copula模型来解决风险聚集的问题。copula可以用来构建损失的联合多元分布,并提供一个相当灵活和现实的模型,允许依赖结构,同时分离边缘分布的特殊特征(如尾部厚度)的影响。这种建模结构允许我们探索风险依赖性对总所需经济资本的影响。利用基于澳大利亚一般保险数据的数值插图,研究了资本要求对copula选择和其他建模假设的敏感性。本文还探讨了在企业风险聚集的背景下,经营多种业务线所带来的多元化利益的相关问题。关键的结论是,在不同的联结假设下,资本要求和多元化效益存在较大的差异。本文的研究结果提醒精算师和其他行业从业者选择合适的资本聚合模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信