An Italian Large Case Study on Emergency Remote Teaching: Factors and Predictors Which Affect Higher Education Students’ Attitude

Matteo Bozzi, R. Mazzola, I. Testa, J. Raffaghelli, S. Sancassani, Maurizio Zani
{"title":"An Italian Large Case Study on Emergency Remote Teaching: Factors and Predictors Which Affect Higher Education Students’ Attitude","authors":"Matteo Bozzi, R. Mazzola, I. Testa, J. Raffaghelli, S. Sancassani, Maurizio Zani","doi":"10.22492/issn.2758-0962.2023.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years many studies on concerns about Emergency Remote Teaching have been implemented, but few focused on the Italian academia. The present large case study involved 3,670 undergraduate and postgraduate learners enrolled on both Architecture and Engineering at the Politecnico di Milano. It aimed to investigate their assessment of remote teaching through an online questionnaire, with reference to changes in their subjective perception of difficulties in the switch from in-presence to remote teaching. Students’ opinion was expressed based on a five-point Likert scale. The overall questionnaire, consisting of 66 items which referred to 6 different constructs, was empirically validated through factor analysis and a positive reliability analysis was completed. Our results highlighted that the overall participants’ perception of difficulties worsened. These findings did not depend on the students’ educational level of degree, while the faculty which they were attending influenced the females’ evaluation. While females enrolled on Architecture did not appear to suffer the change of educational approach, the subjective perception of the ones enrolled on Engineering was markedly worse. On the contrary, faculty did not seem to influence the males’ opinion, which was negative but not as negative as the opinion expressed by the females enrolled on Engineering.","PeriodicalId":168563,"journal":{"name":"PCE Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCE Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2758-0962.2023.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last few years many studies on concerns about Emergency Remote Teaching have been implemented, but few focused on the Italian academia. The present large case study involved 3,670 undergraduate and postgraduate learners enrolled on both Architecture and Engineering at the Politecnico di Milano. It aimed to investigate their assessment of remote teaching through an online questionnaire, with reference to changes in their subjective perception of difficulties in the switch from in-presence to remote teaching. Students’ opinion was expressed based on a five-point Likert scale. The overall questionnaire, consisting of 66 items which referred to 6 different constructs, was empirically validated through factor analysis and a positive reliability analysis was completed. Our results highlighted that the overall participants’ perception of difficulties worsened. These findings did not depend on the students’ educational level of degree, while the faculty which they were attending influenced the females’ evaluation. While females enrolled on Architecture did not appear to suffer the change of educational approach, the subjective perception of the ones enrolled on Engineering was markedly worse. On the contrary, faculty did not seem to influence the males’ opinion, which was negative but not as negative as the opinion expressed by the females enrolled on Engineering.
意大利紧急远程教学大案例研究:影响高等教育学生态度的因素与预测因素
在过去几年中,已经开展了许多关于紧急远程教学问题的研究,但很少关注意大利学术界。目前的大型案例研究涉及3670名米兰理工大学建筑和工程专业的本科生和研究生。该研究旨在通过在线问卷调查他们对远程教学的评价,并参考他们对从在场教学转向远程教学的困难的主观看法的变化。学生们的意见是根据五点李克特量表表达的。整体问卷共66项,涉及6个不同构念,通过因子分析进行实证验证,并完成正信度分析。我们的研究结果强调,总体上,参与者对困难的感知恶化了。这些结果不依赖于学生的教育程度,而他们所就读的学院影响了女性的评价。建筑学专业的女生似乎没有受到教育方式改变的影响,而工程学专业的女生的主观感受明显更差。相反,教师似乎并没有影响男性的意见,这是负面的,但不像工程学的女性所表达的意见那样消极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信