Regulating the Shadow Payment System

J. Greenacre
{"title":"Regulating the Shadow Payment System","authors":"J. Greenacre","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years has seen the growth of the ‘shadow payment system’. This system includes Bitcoin exchanges, PayPal, Alipay in China, and mobile money services in Africa. On current projections, this global ‘shadow payment system’ will perform an ever-greater portion of payments in most economies in the world. This chapter explores what legal tools can be used to protect users’ funds stored within the shadow payment system. It provides a framework for identifying risks to users’ funds, the range of relevant legal tools and their effectiveness, and uses this framework to make three claims. First, insolvency of an actor in the shadow payment system exposes users’ funds to two risks. One is loss of value, which means the potential write-down of funds when users are characterized as unsecured creditors. The other is illiquidity, meaning users face a delay in converting or transferring funds during bankruptcy proceedings. Second, there is little information about legal tools currently used in the shadow payment system and their effectiveness. There is also little guidance on the desirability of using ex post tools, such as deposit insurance and lender of last resort, to protect users’ funds. This is because the policy community is yet to identify the benefits and costs of different roles for the shadow payment system in an economy. Is it an investment asset, alternative retail funds transfer system, vital payment infrastructure on which the economy relies, or something else? Third, mobile money can provide insights into discussions about using legal tools to protect users’ funds. This is because over the past ten years, this shadow payment system has become subject to increasingly sophisticated legal and regulatory regimes. A key insight from mobile money is ex ante and ex post tools appear required to address loss of value and illiquidity risks. A similar package of reforms may be needed to build strong, stable shadow payment systems in Japan, the United States, and other developed countries. The chapter uses mobile money in Malawi as a case study for developing this point.","PeriodicalId":205528,"journal":{"name":"Regulating Blockchain","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulating Blockchain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years has seen the growth of the ‘shadow payment system’. This system includes Bitcoin exchanges, PayPal, Alipay in China, and mobile money services in Africa. On current projections, this global ‘shadow payment system’ will perform an ever-greater portion of payments in most economies in the world. This chapter explores what legal tools can be used to protect users’ funds stored within the shadow payment system. It provides a framework for identifying risks to users’ funds, the range of relevant legal tools and their effectiveness, and uses this framework to make three claims. First, insolvency of an actor in the shadow payment system exposes users’ funds to two risks. One is loss of value, which means the potential write-down of funds when users are characterized as unsecured creditors. The other is illiquidity, meaning users face a delay in converting or transferring funds during bankruptcy proceedings. Second, there is little information about legal tools currently used in the shadow payment system and their effectiveness. There is also little guidance on the desirability of using ex post tools, such as deposit insurance and lender of last resort, to protect users’ funds. This is because the policy community is yet to identify the benefits and costs of different roles for the shadow payment system in an economy. Is it an investment asset, alternative retail funds transfer system, vital payment infrastructure on which the economy relies, or something else? Third, mobile money can provide insights into discussions about using legal tools to protect users’ funds. This is because over the past ten years, this shadow payment system has become subject to increasingly sophisticated legal and regulatory regimes. A key insight from mobile money is ex ante and ex post tools appear required to address loss of value and illiquidity risks. A similar package of reforms may be needed to build strong, stable shadow payment systems in Japan, the United States, and other developed countries. The chapter uses mobile money in Malawi as a case study for developing this point.
规范影子支付体系
近年来,“影子支付系统”得到了发展。该系统包括中国的比特币交易、PayPal、支付宝,以及非洲的移动支付服务。根据目前的预测,这种全球“影子支付系统”将在世界上大多数经济体中发挥越来越大的作用。本章探讨了可以使用哪些法律工具来保护存储在影子支付系统中的用户资金。它提供了一个框架,用于识别用户资金的风险、相关法律工具的范围及其有效性,并利用该框架提出了三个主张。首先,影子支付系统中一个参与者的破产使用户的资金面临两种风险。一个是价值损失,这意味着当用户被描述为无担保债权人时,可能会冲销资金。另一个是流动性不足,这意味着在破产程序期间,用户在转换或转移资金方面面临延迟。其次,关于影子支付系统目前使用的法律工具及其有效性的信息很少。对于使用事后工具(如存款保险和最后贷款人)来保护用户资金的可取性,也几乎没有指导意见。这是因为政策界尚未确定影子支付系统在经济中扮演不同角色的收益和成本。它是一种投资资产、另类零售资金转移系统、经济所依赖的重要支付基础设施,还是别的什么?第三,移动货币可以为使用法律工具保护用户资金的讨论提供见解。这是因为在过去十年中,这种影子支付系统受到了越来越复杂的法律和监管制度的制约。移动货币的一个关键观点是,似乎需要事前和事后工具来解决价值损失和非流动性风险。为了在日本、美国和其他发达国家建立强大、稳定的影子支付系统,可能需要类似的一揽子改革。本章使用马拉维的移动货币作为发展这一点的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信