Comparison of effectiveness of myofascial trigger point release with manual therapy and myofascial release in combination with self stretching in upper cross syndrome

Shakeel Ahmad, Sana Komal, S. Shafique, T. Altaim
{"title":"Comparison of effectiveness of myofascial trigger point release with manual therapy and myofascial release in combination with self stretching in upper cross syndrome","authors":"Shakeel Ahmad, Sana Komal, S. Shafique, T. Altaim","doi":"10.5455/jrcrs.2019070102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Upper cross syndrome is a common postural dysfunctional pattern that describes the dysfunctional tone of the musculature of shoulder girdle/cervicothoracic region of the body. In upper cross syndrome cervical flexors and rhomboid and lower trapezius become weak and pectorals and upper trapezius/elevator and sub occipital become tight. Overuse and tightness of these muscles results in trigger point (hyperirritable points/knots) formation in the belly of the muscles. \nObjective: To compare the effectiveness of myofascial trigger point release in upper cross syndrome versus myofascial trigger point release in combination with self-stretching treatment. \nMethodology: A total of 40 patients with upper cross syndrome were selected for study on the basis of inclusion criteria, randomly allocated in to two groups (each n=20). Group A was treated with myofascial trigger point release alone once a week and followed for 6 weeks, while group B was given the same treatment along with self-stretching home plan. Self-stretching include (chest stretch in sitting, upper trapezius stretch and sub occipital self-stretch include hold for 10-15 sec and release of 5-10 seconds). The pain, disability and Cervical ROM were assessed before and after treatment through Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Goniometry respectively. Data was analyzed on SPSS 20. \nResults: The results shows that patients in Group B improve pain (mean NPRS from 5.40±0.50 to 2.50±0.52) and disability (mean NDI from 36.00±4.47 to 22.20±4.67) more than Group A with pain (mean NPRS from5.45±0.75 to 4.00±0.32) and disability (mean NDI from 31.25±6.85 to 23.20±7.40).Statistically significant results were found between the groups regarding NPRS, NDI and cervical ROM as p value was","PeriodicalId":127606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jrcrs.2019070102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Upper cross syndrome is a common postural dysfunctional pattern that describes the dysfunctional tone of the musculature of shoulder girdle/cervicothoracic region of the body. In upper cross syndrome cervical flexors and rhomboid and lower trapezius become weak and pectorals and upper trapezius/elevator and sub occipital become tight. Overuse and tightness of these muscles results in trigger point (hyperirritable points/knots) formation in the belly of the muscles. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of myofascial trigger point release in upper cross syndrome versus myofascial trigger point release in combination with self-stretching treatment. Methodology: A total of 40 patients with upper cross syndrome were selected for study on the basis of inclusion criteria, randomly allocated in to two groups (each n=20). Group A was treated with myofascial trigger point release alone once a week and followed for 6 weeks, while group B was given the same treatment along with self-stretching home plan. Self-stretching include (chest stretch in sitting, upper trapezius stretch and sub occipital self-stretch include hold for 10-15 sec and release of 5-10 seconds). The pain, disability and Cervical ROM were assessed before and after treatment through Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Goniometry respectively. Data was analyzed on SPSS 20. Results: The results shows that patients in Group B improve pain (mean NPRS from 5.40±0.50 to 2.50±0.52) and disability (mean NDI from 36.00±4.47 to 22.20±4.67) more than Group A with pain (mean NPRS from5.45±0.75 to 4.00±0.32) and disability (mean NDI from 31.25±6.85 to 23.20±7.40).Statistically significant results were found between the groups regarding NPRS, NDI and cervical ROM as p value was
肌筋膜触发点松解与手工疗法与肌筋膜松解联合自我拉伸治疗上交叉综合征的疗效比较
背景:上交叉综合征是一种常见的体位功能失调模式,描述了身体肩带/颈胸区肌肉组织的功能失调。在上交叉综合征中,颈屈肌、菱形肌和下斜方肌变得虚弱,胸肌、上斜方肌/提肌和枕下肌变得紧张。这些肌肉的过度使用和紧绷会导致腹部肌肉的触发点(超易激点/结)形成。目的:比较肌筋膜触发点松解与肌筋膜触发点松解联合自我拉伸治疗上交叉综合征的疗效。方法:根据纳入标准选取40例上交叉综合征患者进行研究,随机分为两组,每组20例。A组给予肌筋膜触发点释放治疗,每周一次,随访6周;B组给予相同治疗,同时给予自我拉伸家庭计划。自我拉伸包括(坐时的胸部拉伸,上斜方肌拉伸和枕下自我拉伸包括保持10-15秒,放松5-10秒)。分别采用数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和角形测量法评估治疗前后疼痛、残疾和颈椎ROM。数据采用SPSS 20进行分析。结果:B组患者在疼痛(平均NPRS从5.40±0.50到2.50±0.52)和失能(平均NDI从36.00±4.47到22.20±4.67)和失能(平均NDI从31.25±6.85到23.20±7.40)方面均优于A组。NPRS、NDI、颈椎ROM组间比较p值均有统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信