Locked Down during the Lockdown

Egodi Uchendu, Amuche Nnabueze, E. Onogwu
{"title":"Locked Down during the Lockdown","authors":"Egodi Uchendu, Amuche Nnabueze, E. Onogwu","doi":"10.1353/aap.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:While the pandemic came with the lockdown that was observed as a measure to curtail the spread of the COVID-19 disease, public Universities in Nigeria were under another kind of lockdown. The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in Nigeria was on a nationwide strike with strict enforcement of compliance to no teaching and other academic activities in every member university. Since academic activities were on a halt, did that mean academics had no academic engagement? Not exactly; different individuals engaged in activities that had academic bias, utilising digital and non-digital tools. This paper looks at how the pandemic shaped these different academic activities within the Nigerian academic circles, as well as the availability and affordability of the digital infrastructure needed for Internet-driven engagement for Nigerian academics. The paper is based on oral conversations with academics from different Nigerian Universities—federal, state and private; as well as on digitally driven questionnaire. The findings show that out of the 1000 academics who was reached through electronic means like email and WhatsApp, using Google form 27 responded and returned the questionnaire on the given deadline. The respondents engaged in various academic activities with writing, research and conference attendance on Zoom virtual meeting app taking the lead. Provisions for conference attendance online was catered for by mostly individual respondents.","PeriodicalId":120795,"journal":{"name":"Alliance for African Partnership Perspectives","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alliance for African Partnership Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aap.2021.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:While the pandemic came with the lockdown that was observed as a measure to curtail the spread of the COVID-19 disease, public Universities in Nigeria were under another kind of lockdown. The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in Nigeria was on a nationwide strike with strict enforcement of compliance to no teaching and other academic activities in every member university. Since academic activities were on a halt, did that mean academics had no academic engagement? Not exactly; different individuals engaged in activities that had academic bias, utilising digital and non-digital tools. This paper looks at how the pandemic shaped these different academic activities within the Nigerian academic circles, as well as the availability and affordability of the digital infrastructure needed for Internet-driven engagement for Nigerian academics. The paper is based on oral conversations with academics from different Nigerian Universities—federal, state and private; as well as on digitally driven questionnaire. The findings show that out of the 1000 academics who was reached through electronic means like email and WhatsApp, using Google form 27 responded and returned the questionnaire on the given deadline. The respondents engaged in various academic activities with writing, research and conference attendance on Zoom virtual meeting app taking the lead. Provisions for conference attendance online was catered for by mostly individual respondents.
在封锁期间被封锁
摘要:虽然大流行伴随着封锁而来,这是遏制COVID-19疾病传播的措施,但尼日利亚的公立大学正处于另一种封锁状态。尼日利亚大学学术人员工会(ASUU)在全国范围内进行罢工,严格执行每个成员大学不教学和其他学术活动的规定。由于学术活动暂停,这是否意味着学者们没有学术参与?不完全;不同的个体使用数字和非数字工具从事具有学术偏见的活动。本文着眼于疫情如何影响尼日利亚学术界的这些不同学术活动,以及尼日利亚学术界互联网参与所需的数字基础设施的可用性和可负担性。这篇论文是基于与尼日利亚不同大学——联邦大学、州立大学和私立大学——的学者的口头对话;以及一份数字驱动的问卷。调查结果显示,在通过电子邮件和WhatsApp等电子方式联系到的1000名学者中,使用谷歌表格27的人在规定的截止日期前回复并归还了问卷。受访者在Zoom虚拟会议应用上以写作、研究和出席会议为主导,从事各种学术活动。在线出席会议的费用主要由个人提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信