Toward Advanced Indoor Mobility Models Through Location-Centric Analysis: Spatio-Temporal Density Dynamics

Mimonah Al Qathrady, A. Helmy
{"title":"Toward Advanced Indoor Mobility Models Through Location-Centric Analysis: Spatio-Temporal Density Dynamics","authors":"Mimonah Al Qathrady, A. Helmy","doi":"10.1145/3242102.3242143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building's density, as its number of nodes at a specific period, is a significant parameter that affects mobile and smart applications performances and evaluations. Consequently, the buildings' temporal density predictions and their nodes spatial distribution modeling have to follow real-world scenarios to provide a realistic evaluation. However, there is lack of real-world building-level density studies that examine these aspects thoroughly. As a result, this work is a data-driven study that investigates the temporal density predictability and spatial density distributions of more than 100 real buildings with ten different categories, over 150 days across three semesters. The study covers the buildings nodes' temporal modeling and predictions, and their spatial distributions in the building. Seasonal predictive models are utilized to predict hour-by-hour density for a variable length of consequent periods using training data with different lengths. The models include Seasonal Naive, Holt-Winters' seasonal additive, TBATS, and ARIMA-seasonal. The results show that the Seasonal Naive model is often selected as the best predictive model when training phase covers a shorter period. For example, Seasonal Naive predicted with the least error in 73%, 63% and 57% of cases in summer, spring, and fall respectively when using only one week to predict its consecutive five weeks with mean normalized error 25% on average. However, when using five weeks of data to predict the sixth week, the TBATS model predicted with the least error in 60%, 54% and 43% of cases in fall, spring and summer respectively with mean absolute error 19% on average. When investigating the spatial density distributions, power law, log-logistic and lognormal distributions are usually selected as the first best-fit distributions for 82%, 65%, 62% of buildings in the summer, spring and fall respectively.","PeriodicalId":241359,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3242102.3242143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Building's density, as its number of nodes at a specific period, is a significant parameter that affects mobile and smart applications performances and evaluations. Consequently, the buildings' temporal density predictions and their nodes spatial distribution modeling have to follow real-world scenarios to provide a realistic evaluation. However, there is lack of real-world building-level density studies that examine these aspects thoroughly. As a result, this work is a data-driven study that investigates the temporal density predictability and spatial density distributions of more than 100 real buildings with ten different categories, over 150 days across three semesters. The study covers the buildings nodes' temporal modeling and predictions, and their spatial distributions in the building. Seasonal predictive models are utilized to predict hour-by-hour density for a variable length of consequent periods using training data with different lengths. The models include Seasonal Naive, Holt-Winters' seasonal additive, TBATS, and ARIMA-seasonal. The results show that the Seasonal Naive model is often selected as the best predictive model when training phase covers a shorter period. For example, Seasonal Naive predicted with the least error in 73%, 63% and 57% of cases in summer, spring, and fall respectively when using only one week to predict its consecutive five weeks with mean normalized error 25% on average. However, when using five weeks of data to predict the sixth week, the TBATS model predicted with the least error in 60%, 54% and 43% of cases in fall, spring and summer respectively with mean absolute error 19% on average. When investigating the spatial density distributions, power law, log-logistic and lognormal distributions are usually selected as the first best-fit distributions for 82%, 65%, 62% of buildings in the summer, spring and fall respectively.
基于位置中心分析的先进室内移动模型:时空密度动态
建筑物的密度,即建筑物在特定时期的节点数量,是影响移动和智能应用程序性能和评估的重要参数。因此,建筑物的时间密度预测及其节点空间分布建模必须遵循现实世界的场景,以提供现实的评估。然而,缺乏真实世界的建筑密度研究来彻底检查这些方面。因此,这项工作是一项数据驱动的研究,该研究调查了100多个真实建筑的时间密度可预测性和空间密度分布,这些建筑有10个不同的类别,在三个学期的150天内。研究了建筑物节点的时间建模和预测,以及它们在建筑物中的空间分布。季节性预测模型利用不同长度的训练数据,对不同长度的后续周期进行逐小时的密度预测。模型包括:Seasonal Naive、Holt-Winters的季节性添加剂、TBATS和ARIMA-seasonal。结果表明,当训练阶段较短时,通常选择季节朴素模型作为最佳预测模型。例如,当仅用一周时间预测其连续五周的平均归一化误差为25%时,季节性天真法在夏季、春季和秋季的预测误差分别为73%、63%和57%。然而,当使用5周的数据预测第六周时,TBATS模型在秋季、春季和夏季的预测误差最小,分别为60%、54%和43%,平均绝对误差平均为19%。在研究空间密度分布时,通常选择幂律分布、对数逻辑分布和对数正态分布作为夏季、春季和秋季建筑的第一最佳拟合分布,分别为82%、65%和62%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信