Analysis of optimally composed EV pools for the aggregated provision of frequency containment reserve and energy arbitrage trading

B. Tepe, J. Figgener, S. Englberger, A. Jossen, D. Uwe Sauer, H. Hesse
{"title":"Analysis of optimally composed EV pools for the aggregated provision of frequency containment reserve and energy arbitrage trading","authors":"B. Tepe, J. Figgener, S. Englberger, A. Jossen, D. Uwe Sauer, H. Hesse","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.2521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric vehicles (EVs) can participate in various markets through a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) interface. Aggregators can combine the individual contributions of EVs to offer them, for example, on the frequency containment reserve (FCR) market or to use them for arbitrage trading. A simple approach is combining EVs in random fashion until the pool is able to reach the threshold for a service of choice. Alternatively, aggregators can compose their pools in smart fashion and include only EVs that contribute significantly to the pool's performance. In a previous publication, we have shown that optimizing the aggregated pools of commercial vehicles for the provision of FCR or arbitrage trading can increase revenues by up to 7-fold. In this work, we analyze the optimally composed pools and show that large vehicle batteries in the order of 80 kWh are particularly useful for arbitrage trading, while FCR provision is also possible with medium-sized EV batteries in the range of 30 kWh due to the small cycle depths. The inclusion of EVs with very small vehicle batteries around 20 kWh in aggregated pools is neither economically optimal for arbitrage trading nor for FCR provision. An analysis of the economic sectors of the commercial EVs selected for the optimal EV pools shows that some economic sectors are more suitable for V2G than others: In particular EVs of the sector “human health and social work activities” are unsuitable for V2G provision due to regular and long travel times during the day. In contrast, EVs from the \"manufacturing\" sector are particularly well represented in all applications and the \"transportation and storage\" sector in the arbitrage application. In addition to these analyses of the optimized pools, we reveal that a reduction in the required minimum power and increments would make the FCR market even more attractive to EV pools by increasing revenues by 50% to 66%. It would also better exploit the potential of EVs, as increments could be better utilized than they are in the current 1 MW minimum power requirement in central Europe.","PeriodicalId":358724,"journal":{"name":"5th E-Mobility Power System Integration Symposium (EMOB 2021)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th E-Mobility Power System Integration Symposium (EMOB 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.2521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) can participate in various markets through a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) interface. Aggregators can combine the individual contributions of EVs to offer them, for example, on the frequency containment reserve (FCR) market or to use them for arbitrage trading. A simple approach is combining EVs in random fashion until the pool is able to reach the threshold for a service of choice. Alternatively, aggregators can compose their pools in smart fashion and include only EVs that contribute significantly to the pool's performance. In a previous publication, we have shown that optimizing the aggregated pools of commercial vehicles for the provision of FCR or arbitrage trading can increase revenues by up to 7-fold. In this work, we analyze the optimally composed pools and show that large vehicle batteries in the order of 80 kWh are particularly useful for arbitrage trading, while FCR provision is also possible with medium-sized EV batteries in the range of 30 kWh due to the small cycle depths. The inclusion of EVs with very small vehicle batteries around 20 kWh in aggregated pools is neither economically optimal for arbitrage trading nor for FCR provision. An analysis of the economic sectors of the commercial EVs selected for the optimal EV pools shows that some economic sectors are more suitable for V2G than others: In particular EVs of the sector “human health and social work activities” are unsuitable for V2G provision due to regular and long travel times during the day. In contrast, EVs from the "manufacturing" sector are particularly well represented in all applications and the "transportation and storage" sector in the arbitrage application. In addition to these analyses of the optimized pools, we reveal that a reduction in the required minimum power and increments would make the FCR market even more attractive to EV pools by increasing revenues by 50% to 66%. It would also better exploit the potential of EVs, as increments could be better utilized than they are in the current 1 MW minimum power requirement in central Europe.
基于频率控制储备和能源套利交易的电动汽车池优化配置分析
电动汽车(ev)可以通过车辆到电网(V2G)接口参与各种市场。聚合器可以将电动汽车的个人贡献结合起来,例如在频率控制储备(FCR)市场上提供它们,或将它们用于套利交易。一种简单的方法是以随机方式组合电动汽车,直到池能够达到所选服务的阈值。或者,聚合器可以以智能方式组成它们的池,并且只包含对池的性能有重大贡献的电动汽车。在之前的一篇文章中,我们已经表明,优化提供FCR或套利交易的商用车总池可以使收入增加多达7倍。在这项工作中,我们分析了最优组合池,并表明80千瓦时左右的大型汽车电池对套利交易特别有用,而由于循环深度小,30千瓦时范围内的中型电动汽车电池也可以提供FCR。将配备20千瓦时左右非常小的汽车电池的电动汽车纳入聚合池,无论是套利交易还是FCR供应,都不是经济上的最佳选择。对优选电动汽车池的商业电动汽车的经济部门进行分析,发现一些经济部门比其他经济部门更适合提供V2G:特别是“人类健康和社会工作活动”部门的电动汽车,由于白天经常和长时间行驶,不适合提供V2G。相比之下,来自“制造”部门的电动汽车在所有应用中都有很好的代表性,而在套利应用中,来自“运输和存储”部门的电动汽车也有很好的代表性。除了这些优化池的分析之外,我们还发现,减少所需的最小功率和增量将使FCR市场对电动汽车池更具吸引力,从而增加50%至66%的收入。它还可以更好地利用电动汽车的潜力,因为增量可以比中欧目前1兆瓦的最低电力需求更好地利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信