Evaluating Refresher Training on Masters’ Course of Rural Development Subject

B. B. Khatri, Rajan Binayak Pasa
{"title":"Evaluating Refresher Training on Masters’ Course of Rural Development Subject","authors":"B. B. Khatri, Rajan Binayak Pasa","doi":"10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The refresher course training is pivotal for strengthening teachers’ commitment, sharing knowledge, increasing self-confidence, and keeping them up to date on current teaching learning activities. With this consideration, the aim of this paper is to assess the present syllabus of MA in Rural Development and evaluate the refresher course training program based on four levels of evaluation such as reaction, learning, behavior and result of the program. For that purpose, we purposively selected 25 participants who were associated in 21 campuses including Central Department. We applied survey based evaluation research method and Kirkpatrick four levels (reaction, learning, behavior and result) training evaluation model for assessing and examining outcomes of trainings. It reveals that the training program has evolved into an academic platform for students to share their personal experiences with course structure, teaching learning practices, and student performance. It has increased the capacity of the subject coordinators/teacher in terms of networking, course structure/function, performance assessment and constructivist pedagogy. Besides, they have developed a good network amongst the participants and resource persons. The major outputs of the program are SWOC analysis of course structure, 3Rs (Revisit, Revision and Restructure) course concept as well as list of lesson learn and new possible papers (course of study). Therefore, this short term training might brought long term impact improving course structure/function including pedagogical practices. Finally, course function scale, conceptual learning scale, Constructivist Pedagogy/learning theory scale, level four result/outcomes scale and characteristics of the participants are interlinked and associated significantly.","PeriodicalId":157329,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Development Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/cdj.v30i44.54971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The refresher course training is pivotal for strengthening teachers’ commitment, sharing knowledge, increasing self-confidence, and keeping them up to date on current teaching learning activities. With this consideration, the aim of this paper is to assess the present syllabus of MA in Rural Development and evaluate the refresher course training program based on four levels of evaluation such as reaction, learning, behavior and result of the program. For that purpose, we purposively selected 25 participants who were associated in 21 campuses including Central Department. We applied survey based evaluation research method and Kirkpatrick four levels (reaction, learning, behavior and result) training evaluation model for assessing and examining outcomes of trainings. It reveals that the training program has evolved into an academic platform for students to share their personal experiences with course structure, teaching learning practices, and student performance. It has increased the capacity of the subject coordinators/teacher in terms of networking, course structure/function, performance assessment and constructivist pedagogy. Besides, they have developed a good network amongst the participants and resource persons. The major outputs of the program are SWOC analysis of course structure, 3Rs (Revisit, Revision and Restructure) course concept as well as list of lesson learn and new possible papers (course of study). Therefore, this short term training might brought long term impact improving course structure/function including pedagogical practices. Finally, course function scale, conceptual learning scale, Constructivist Pedagogy/learning theory scale, level four result/outcomes scale and characteristics of the participants are interlinked and associated significantly.
农村发展学科硕士课程进修培训评价
进修课程的培训对于加强教师的承诺、分享知识、增强自信心、及时了解当前的教学活动至关重要。基于此,本文旨在对现行的农村发展硕士课程大纲进行评估,并从课程的反应、学习、行为和结果四个层面对进修课程培训计划进行评估。为此,我们有针对性地选择了包括中央部在内的21个校区的25名参与者。运用基于调查的评价研究方法和Kirkpatrick四层次(反应、学习、行为和结果)培训评价模型对培训效果进行评价和考核。从课程结构、教学实践和学生表现等方面来看,培训项目已经发展成为学生分享个人经验的学术平台。它提高了学科协调员/教师在网络、课程结构/功能、成绩评价和建构主义教学法方面的能力。此外,他们在参与者和资源人员之间建立了良好的网络。该项目的主要成果是课程结构的SWOC分析、3Rs(重访、修订和重组)课程概念以及课程学习和新论文(课程学习)清单。因此,这种短期培训可能会带来长期影响,改善课程结构/功能,包括教学实践。最后,课程功能量表、概念学习量表、建构主义教育学/学习理论量表、四级结果/结果量表与参与者特征之间存在显著的相互关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信