Full Scale Test Validation of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Flaws in ERW Pipe

S. Tiku, M. Ghovanlou, A. Dinovitzer, M. Piazza, T. A. Jones
{"title":"Full Scale Test Validation of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Flaws in ERW Pipe","authors":"S. Tiku, M. Ghovanlou, A. Dinovitzer, M. Piazza, T. A. Jones","doi":"10.1115/IPC2020-9705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While the general fracture mechanics principles and methodologies for calculating fatigue lives are well documented and validated, their application in the prediction of pipeline system fatigue lives differed from field experience. The source and magnitude of the conservatism inherent in the calculated fatigue life estimates are an important element when establishing integrity management programs. Of particular interest are the fatigue life estimates used in integrity management programs for electric resistance welded (ERW) pipeline systems that may have pipe seam anomalies oriented along the pipe axis. BMT Canada Ltd (BMT) was contracted by Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) to develop a pipeline material fatigue crack growth database and conduct full scale cyclic pressure fatigue tests to develop improved crack growth rate parameters.\n A pipeline material fatigue crack growth database was developed using 185 fatigue crack growth rate tests on 45 pipeline materials ranging in grade from X46 to X70 and in vintage from 1937 to 2014. The database included fatigue crack growth rate tests on 18 pipe body base materials (BM) and 27 ERW weld seam materials at two different, stress ratios (R), of R-ratio = 0.1 and R-ratio = 0.6. The sampled crack growth rates observed in the pipeline steels, tested in the project were 2 to 3 times lower than the crack growth rates recommended in BS 7910. This paper presents the proposed power (Paris) law fatigue crack growth equation parameters, C and m, developed in the study.\n Two full-scale cyclic pressure tests were carried out to validate the use of recommended crack growth rate parameters. Axial flaws were machined in the pipe body and weld center line (WCL). Fifty-one (51) flaws of different lengths and depths were machined. The crack growth rates were monitored during the cyclic pressure tests by recording crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD). The calibration curves for correlating CMODs with crack depths were developed and validated against finite element (FE) analysis. The fatigue crack growth rates observed in the full-scale tests were then compared with existing BS 7910 and API 579 formulations.\n The comparison confirmed that the BS 7910 approach results in very conservative estimates of fatigue crack growth rates for axial flaws. The BS 7910 stress intensity factor formulation overestimated the bulging correction for axially oriented flaws. The API 579 fracture mechanics-based fatigue crack growth formulation combined with crack growth rate parameters developed in this program provided improved estimates for fatigue life. The fatigue crack growth rates for line pipe and ERW weld seams developed in this project were shown to be less conservative and better predictors for fatigue crack growth and represent a valuable tool for pipeline integrity management. The use of this information will enable pipeline operators to focus remedial actions on features that have the lowest estimated fatigue lives.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the general fracture mechanics principles and methodologies for calculating fatigue lives are well documented and validated, their application in the prediction of pipeline system fatigue lives differed from field experience. The source and magnitude of the conservatism inherent in the calculated fatigue life estimates are an important element when establishing integrity management programs. Of particular interest are the fatigue life estimates used in integrity management programs for electric resistance welded (ERW) pipeline systems that may have pipe seam anomalies oriented along the pipe axis. BMT Canada Ltd (BMT) was contracted by Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) to develop a pipeline material fatigue crack growth database and conduct full scale cyclic pressure fatigue tests to develop improved crack growth rate parameters. A pipeline material fatigue crack growth database was developed using 185 fatigue crack growth rate tests on 45 pipeline materials ranging in grade from X46 to X70 and in vintage from 1937 to 2014. The database included fatigue crack growth rate tests on 18 pipe body base materials (BM) and 27 ERW weld seam materials at two different, stress ratios (R), of R-ratio = 0.1 and R-ratio = 0.6. The sampled crack growth rates observed in the pipeline steels, tested in the project were 2 to 3 times lower than the crack growth rates recommended in BS 7910. This paper presents the proposed power (Paris) law fatigue crack growth equation parameters, C and m, developed in the study. Two full-scale cyclic pressure tests were carried out to validate the use of recommended crack growth rate parameters. Axial flaws were machined in the pipe body and weld center line (WCL). Fifty-one (51) flaws of different lengths and depths were machined. The crack growth rates were monitored during the cyclic pressure tests by recording crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD). The calibration curves for correlating CMODs with crack depths were developed and validated against finite element (FE) analysis. The fatigue crack growth rates observed in the full-scale tests were then compared with existing BS 7910 and API 579 formulations. The comparison confirmed that the BS 7910 approach results in very conservative estimates of fatigue crack growth rates for axial flaws. The BS 7910 stress intensity factor formulation overestimated the bulging correction for axially oriented flaws. The API 579 fracture mechanics-based fatigue crack growth formulation combined with crack growth rate parameters developed in this program provided improved estimates for fatigue life. The fatigue crack growth rates for line pipe and ERW weld seams developed in this project were shown to be less conservative and better predictors for fatigue crack growth and represent a valuable tool for pipeline integrity management. The use of this information will enable pipeline operators to focus remedial actions on features that have the lowest estimated fatigue lives.
ERW管缺陷疲劳裂纹扩展速率的全尺寸试验验证
虽然计算疲劳寿命的一般断裂力学原理和方法已经得到了充分的记录和验证,但它们在预测管道系统疲劳寿命方面的应用与现场经验不同。在制定完整性管理方案时,计算疲劳寿命估计中固有的保守性的来源和程度是一个重要因素。特别令人感兴趣的是电阻焊(ERW)管道系统完整性管理程序中使用的疲劳寿命估计,这些系统可能具有沿管道轴方向的管道接缝异常。BMT加拿大有限公司(BMT)与国际管道研究委员会(PRCI)签订合同,开发管道材料疲劳裂纹扩展数据库,并进行全尺寸循环压力疲劳试验,以开发改进的裂纹扩展速率参数。通过对1937 ~ 2014年45种等级为X46 ~ X70的管道材料进行185次疲劳裂纹扩展速率试验,建立了管道材料疲劳裂纹扩展数据库。该数据库包括18种管体基体材料(BM)和27种ERW焊缝材料在R-ratio = 0.1和R-ratio = 0.6两种不同应力比(R)下的疲劳裂纹扩展速率试验。在项目中测试的管道钢中观察到的裂纹扩展速率取样比BS 7910中建议的裂纹扩展速率低2到3倍。本文提出了本研究提出的幂(Paris)定律疲劳裂纹扩展方程参数C和m。进行了两次全尺寸循环压力试验,以验证所推荐的裂纹扩展速率参数的使用。在管体和焊缝中心线处加工轴向缺陷。加工了51个不同长度和深度的缺陷。通过记录裂纹张开位移(CMOD)来监测裂纹在循环压力试验中的扩展速率。建立了CMODs与裂纹深度相关的标定曲线,并通过有限元分析进行了验证。然后将全尺寸试验中观察到的疲劳裂纹扩展速率与现有的BS 7910和API 579配方进行比较。对比证实,BS 7910方法对轴向缺陷的疲劳裂纹扩展速率的估计非常保守。BS 7910应力强度因子公式高估了轴向缺陷的胀形校正。基于断裂力学的API 579疲劳裂纹扩展公式与该程序开发的裂纹扩展速率参数相结合,提供了对疲劳寿命的改进估计。该项目开发的管线和ERW焊缝的疲劳裂纹扩展速率具有较低的保守性和较好的预测疲劳裂纹扩展的能力,为管道完整性管理提供了有价值的工具。使用这些信息将使管道运营商能够将补救措施集中在估计疲劳寿命最低的特征上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信