Learning Design From Day One of Undergraduate Studies

R. Birmingham
{"title":"Learning Design From Day One of Undergraduate Studies","authors":"R. Birmingham","doi":"10.5957/imdc-2022-340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All engineering courses, including naval architecture, have to ensure that the students gain a firm grasp of both analysis and synthesis techniques. However there is a significant difference between how these two are dealt with in educational programmes: analysis techniques are conventionally taught in detail and extensively throughout the three or four years of an undergraduate course, while synthesis is often ignored until the final stages of a degree programme, and then dealt with in a relatively cursory fashion. This is understandable as analysis techniques are far more involved, and require many hours of study to grasp and, more fundamentally, it can be asked, how can you synthesise a solution without first learning to analyse and evaluate it? However naval architects are essentially designers, so it would clearly be beneficial if our students were learning the entire process of design, meaning both analysis and synthesis, from the earliest stages of their programmes.\n This paper will report on the recent experience at Newcastle University where, following a review and reorganisation of our undergraduate programmes, design theory and practice has been introduced to the course from day one. In the paper the rational for the reorganisation will be briefly outlined, but the main focus of the paper will be on the teaching and learning process, which has involved presenting the students with a series of paper and cardboard boat design challenges that they have to respond to by undertaking design-and-build exercises throughout the first semester of their course. Despite the students having little of no knowledge of analysis techniques the challenges introduce them to the concepts of elicitation, creativity, synthesis, optimisation, satisfycing, evaluating, and of virtual prototyping.\n The paper will conclude with a student led review of the value of this approach.","PeriodicalId":184250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Tue, June 28, 2022","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Tue, June 28, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/imdc-2022-340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All engineering courses, including naval architecture, have to ensure that the students gain a firm grasp of both analysis and synthesis techniques. However there is a significant difference between how these two are dealt with in educational programmes: analysis techniques are conventionally taught in detail and extensively throughout the three or four years of an undergraduate course, while synthesis is often ignored until the final stages of a degree programme, and then dealt with in a relatively cursory fashion. This is understandable as analysis techniques are far more involved, and require many hours of study to grasp and, more fundamentally, it can be asked, how can you synthesise a solution without first learning to analyse and evaluate it? However naval architects are essentially designers, so it would clearly be beneficial if our students were learning the entire process of design, meaning both analysis and synthesis, from the earliest stages of their programmes. This paper will report on the recent experience at Newcastle University where, following a review and reorganisation of our undergraduate programmes, design theory and practice has been introduced to the course from day one. In the paper the rational for the reorganisation will be briefly outlined, but the main focus of the paper will be on the teaching and learning process, which has involved presenting the students with a series of paper and cardboard boat design challenges that they have to respond to by undertaking design-and-build exercises throughout the first semester of their course. Despite the students having little of no knowledge of analysis techniques the challenges introduce them to the concepts of elicitation, creativity, synthesis, optimisation, satisfycing, evaluating, and of virtual prototyping. The paper will conclude with a student led review of the value of this approach.
从本科学习的第一天开始学习设计
所有的工程课程,包括造船,都必须确保学生牢固掌握分析和综合技术。然而,在教育课程中处理这两者的方式有很大的不同:分析技术通常在三到四年的本科课程中被详细和广泛地教授,而综合通常被忽略,直到学位课程的最后阶段,然后以相对粗略的方式处理。这是可以理解的,因为分析技术要复杂得多,需要很多小时的学习才能掌握,更根本的是,你可以问,如果不先学会分析和评估,你怎么能合成一个解决方案?然而,造船师本质上是设计师,所以如果我们的学生从他们项目的最初阶段就学习设计的整个过程,包括分析和综合,这显然是有益的。本文将报告纽卡斯尔大学最近的经验,在对我们的本科课程进行审查和重组后,设计理论和实践从第一天起就被引入到课程中。在论文中,将简要概述重组的原因,但论文的主要重点将放在教学过程上,这涉及到向学生展示一系列纸和纸板船设计挑战,他们必须通过在整个第一学期的课程中进行设计和建造练习来应对。尽管学生对分析技术知之甚少,但挑战向他们介绍了启发、创造力、综合、优化、满足、评估和虚拟原型的概念。这篇论文将以学生领导的对这种方法的价值的回顾来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信