Vested Interests: Examining the Political Obstacles to Power Sector Reform in Twenty Indian States

Chao-Yo Cheng, Y. Lee, Galen Murray, Yuree Noh, Johannes Urpelainen, Joseph Van Horn
{"title":"Vested Interests: Examining the Political Obstacles to Power Sector Reform in Twenty Indian States","authors":"Chao-Yo Cheng, Y. Lee, Galen Murray, Yuree Noh, Johannes Urpelainen, Joseph Van Horn","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3682758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Why do power sector reform succeed and fail in democratic contexts? We conduct comparative case studies of these reforms in the largest 20 Indian states. These states have responded to India’s electricity generation, transmission, and distribution crises in different ways. Similar to conventional case studies, our research design has the virtue of allowing us to explore historical processes. However, having a large number of cases also enables us to consider multiple causal factors at the same time. Both the findings and non-findings speak to the broad debate on the possible causes of reform failure. We find support for hypotheses emphasizing electoral opportunism and the politics of interest group (organized labor, agricultural interests). In contrast, partisan cleavages do not seem to explain reform failure. These findings offer new insights into politically feasible reform strategies for India.","PeriodicalId":415834,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Comparative Case Studies of Industrial Policies & Regulatory Experiences in Emerging Markets (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Comparative Case Studies of Industrial Policies & Regulatory Experiences in Emerging Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3682758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Why do power sector reform succeed and fail in democratic contexts? We conduct comparative case studies of these reforms in the largest 20 Indian states. These states have responded to India’s electricity generation, transmission, and distribution crises in different ways. Similar to conventional case studies, our research design has the virtue of allowing us to explore historical processes. However, having a large number of cases also enables us to consider multiple causal factors at the same time. Both the findings and non-findings speak to the broad debate on the possible causes of reform failure. We find support for hypotheses emphasizing electoral opportunism and the politics of interest group (organized labor, agricultural interests). In contrast, partisan cleavages do not seem to explain reform failure. These findings offer new insights into politically feasible reform strategies for India.
既得利益:检视印度二十个邦电力部门改革的政治障碍
民主背景下电力行业改革成败的原因?我们在印度最大的20个邦对这些改革进行了比较案例研究。这些邦以不同的方式应对印度的发电、输电和配电危机。与传统的案例研究类似,我们的研究设计具有允许我们探索历史进程的优点。然而,大量的案例也使我们能够同时考虑多个因果因素。调查结果和非调查结果都说明了关于改革失败的可能原因的广泛辩论。我们发现支持强调选举机会主义和利益集团政治(有组织的劳工,农业利益)的假设。相比之下,党派分歧似乎并不能解释改革的失败。这些发现为印度政治上可行的改革策略提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信