Domestic Constraints on Foreign Policy Change in Belarus

Paul Hansbury
{"title":"Domestic Constraints on Foreign Policy Change in Belarus","authors":"Paul Hansbury","doi":"10.30965/20526512-BJA10014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAfter 2014 the relationship between Russia and its ally Belarus was strained. Russia was dissatisfied with Belarus’s foreign policy and sought to influence the latter’s international affairs. This article considers the extent of change and continuity in Belarus’s foreign policy, and thus whether Russia’s criticisms reflect consequential shifts, covering the period 2016–2019. The analysis begins with the removal of EU sanctions, which afforded Belarus new opportunities, and ends before the protest movement that emerged ahead of the election in 2020. The study considers three policy areas: international trade; diplomacy more broadly; and foreign policy concerns for prestige. The article argues that Belarus made appreciable policy changes in response to structural pressures in the period 2016–2019, but the parameters of these foreign policy shifts were necessarily highly constrained by domestic interest group competition which prevents Belarus distancing itself from Russia. It concludes with a brief reflection on how the 2020 election protests and repressions affect the dynamics described.","PeriodicalId":277512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Belarusian Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Belarusian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/20526512-BJA10014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After 2014 the relationship between Russia and its ally Belarus was strained. Russia was dissatisfied with Belarus’s foreign policy and sought to influence the latter’s international affairs. This article considers the extent of change and continuity in Belarus’s foreign policy, and thus whether Russia’s criticisms reflect consequential shifts, covering the period 2016–2019. The analysis begins with the removal of EU sanctions, which afforded Belarus new opportunities, and ends before the protest movement that emerged ahead of the election in 2020. The study considers three policy areas: international trade; diplomacy more broadly; and foreign policy concerns for prestige. The article argues that Belarus made appreciable policy changes in response to structural pressures in the period 2016–2019, but the parameters of these foreign policy shifts were necessarily highly constrained by domestic interest group competition which prevents Belarus distancing itself from Russia. It concludes with a brief reflection on how the 2020 election protests and repressions affect the dynamics described.
白俄罗斯外交政策变化的国内制约因素
2014年之后,俄罗斯与其盟友白俄罗斯的关系变得紧张。俄罗斯对白俄罗斯的外交政策不满,试图影响白俄罗斯的国际事务。本文考虑了白俄罗斯外交政策的变化程度和连续性,以及俄罗斯的批评是否反映了2016-2019年期间白俄罗斯外交政策的相应变化。分析开始于欧盟制裁的取消,这给白俄罗斯带来了新的机会,结束于2020年大选前出现的抗议运动。该研究考虑了三个政策领域:国际贸易;更广泛的外交;外交政策关注声望。文章认为,白俄罗斯在2016-2019年期间为应对结构性压力做出了明显的政策变化,但这些外交政策变化的参数必然受到国内利益集团竞争的高度限制,这阻碍了白俄罗斯与俄罗斯保持距离。文章最后简要回顾了2020年选举抗议和镇压如何影响所描述的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信