A review of mathematical models of human trust in automation

Lucero Rodriguez Rodriguez, Carlos Bustamante Orellana, Erin K. Chiou, Lixiao Huang, Nancy J. Cooke, Yun Kang
{"title":"A review of mathematical models of human trust in automation","authors":"Lucero Rodriguez Rodriguez, Carlos Bustamante Orellana, Erin K. Chiou, Lixiao Huang, Nancy J. Cooke, Yun Kang","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1171403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how people trust autonomous systems is crucial to achieving better performance and safety in human-autonomy teaming. Trust in automation is a rich and complex process that has given rise to numerous measures and approaches aimed at comprehending and examining it. Although researchers have been developing models for understanding the dynamics of trust in automation for several decades, these models are primarily conceptual and often involve components that are difficult to measure. Mathematical models have emerged as powerful tools for gaining insightful knowledge about the dynamic processes of trust in automation. This paper provides an overview of various mathematical modeling approaches, their limitations, feasibility, and generalizability for trust dynamics in human-automation interaction contexts. Furthermore, this study proposes a novel and dynamic approach to model trust in automation, emphasizing the importance of incorporating different timescales into measurable components. Due to the complex nature of trust in automation, it is also suggested to combine machine learning and dynamic modeling approaches, as well as incorporating physiological data.","PeriodicalId":207447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1171403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how people trust autonomous systems is crucial to achieving better performance and safety in human-autonomy teaming. Trust in automation is a rich and complex process that has given rise to numerous measures and approaches aimed at comprehending and examining it. Although researchers have been developing models for understanding the dynamics of trust in automation for several decades, these models are primarily conceptual and often involve components that are difficult to measure. Mathematical models have emerged as powerful tools for gaining insightful knowledge about the dynamic processes of trust in automation. This paper provides an overview of various mathematical modeling approaches, their limitations, feasibility, and generalizability for trust dynamics in human-automation interaction contexts. Furthermore, this study proposes a novel and dynamic approach to model trust in automation, emphasizing the importance of incorporating different timescales into measurable components. Due to the complex nature of trust in automation, it is also suggested to combine machine learning and dynamic modeling approaches, as well as incorporating physiological data.
自动化中人类信任的数学模型综述
了解人们如何信任自主系统对于在人类自主团队中实现更好的性能和安全性至关重要。对自动化的信任是一个丰富而复杂的过程,它产生了许多旨在理解和检查它的措施和方法。尽管几十年来研究人员一直在开发模型来理解自动化中的信任动态,但这些模型主要是概念性的,并且通常涉及难以测量的组件。数学模型已经成为获得关于自动化信任动态过程的深刻知识的强大工具。本文概述了各种数学建模方法,它们的局限性,可行性,以及在人机交互环境下信任动力学的推广。此外,本研究提出了一种新的动态方法来模拟自动化中的信任,强调了将不同的时间尺度纳入可测量组件的重要性。由于自动化信任的复杂性,还建议将机器学习和动态建模方法结合起来,并纳入生理数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信