Estimation Of Original Oil In Place For Belhedan Oil Field By Using Volumetric Method, Material Balance Equation Method, And Reservoir Simulation Method

A. Nasar, Jibriel Abusaleem, Essa M Tabar
{"title":"Estimation Of Original Oil In Place For Belhedan Oil Field By Using Volumetric Method, Material Balance Equation Method, And Reservoir Simulation Method","authors":"A. Nasar, Jibriel Abusaleem, Essa M Tabar","doi":"10.21467/PROCEEDINGS.2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowing the amount of the hydrocarbon pore volume correctly is basically required to have properly design of oil and gas reservoirs. The accuracy in calculating of the hydrocarbon pore volume depends on the used method. Usually two conventional methods use to estimate the Original Oil In Place (OOIP) very quickly. These two methods are volumetric method and Material-Balance-Equation (MBE) method. However, there is another quick method that can be used to calculate (OOIP) which is reservoir simulation method. In this paper, three difference methods were used to calculate OOIP to provide Waha Oil Company with the calculated value. Moreover, each method required sort of data; the volumetric method depends on static data. However MBE and reservoir simulation method require dynamic data of the reservoir and the area around. Usually the driving mechanism is the key point when MBE and reservoir simulation are used. The drive mechanism in studied area (Belhedan oil field) is described from the field information as a strong water drive with small gas-cap. The given field data don’t have any information about the gas cap and the water dive. As a result, applying the MBE method to calculate OOIP for this case require some information about the gas cap and the aquifer. So the MBE gave a value of OOIP didn’t agree with the value of OOIP that obtained from the volumetric and reservoir simulation. Lack in the information makes MBE unusable method in this case. It has been trying to solve this problem by use some correlation in calculate some parameters and ignore others. However, doing all that, the result couldn’t reach any closed value that is calculated by volumetric and reservoir simulation which will explain. In the end of the paper, a prediction of well performance (well v-4) will be done from 1970 until 2020.","PeriodicalId":369478,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of First Conference for Engineering Sciences and Technology: Vol. 1","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of First Conference for Engineering Sciences and Technology: Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21467/PROCEEDINGS.2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Knowing the amount of the hydrocarbon pore volume correctly is basically required to have properly design of oil and gas reservoirs. The accuracy in calculating of the hydrocarbon pore volume depends on the used method. Usually two conventional methods use to estimate the Original Oil In Place (OOIP) very quickly. These two methods are volumetric method and Material-Balance-Equation (MBE) method. However, there is another quick method that can be used to calculate (OOIP) which is reservoir simulation method. In this paper, three difference methods were used to calculate OOIP to provide Waha Oil Company with the calculated value. Moreover, each method required sort of data; the volumetric method depends on static data. However MBE and reservoir simulation method require dynamic data of the reservoir and the area around. Usually the driving mechanism is the key point when MBE and reservoir simulation are used. The drive mechanism in studied area (Belhedan oil field) is described from the field information as a strong water drive with small gas-cap. The given field data don’t have any information about the gas cap and the water dive. As a result, applying the MBE method to calculate OOIP for this case require some information about the gas cap and the aquifer. So the MBE gave a value of OOIP didn’t agree with the value of OOIP that obtained from the volumetric and reservoir simulation. Lack in the information makes MBE unusable method in this case. It has been trying to solve this problem by use some correlation in calculate some parameters and ignore others. However, doing all that, the result couldn’t reach any closed value that is calculated by volumetric and reservoir simulation which will explain. In the end of the paper, a prediction of well performance (well v-4) will be done from 1970 until 2020.
用体积法、物质平衡方程法和油藏模拟法估算贝尔黑丹油田原始储量
正确认识油气孔隙体积的大小是合理设计油气藏的基本要求。烃类孔隙体积的计算精度取决于所采用的方法。通常有两种常规方法用于快速估算原始原地油(OOIP)。这两种方法分别是体积法和物料平衡方程法。然而,还有一种快速计算OOIP的方法,即油藏模拟方法。本文采用三种不同的方法计算OOIP,为瓦哈石油公司提供计算值。此外,每种方法都需要数据分类;体积法依赖于静态数据。然而,MBE和油藏模拟方法需要油藏及其周围区域的动态数据。通常在MBE和油藏模拟中,驱动机理是关键。根据油田资料,将研究区(贝尔黑丹油田)的驱油机理描述为小气顶强水驱。给定的现场数据没有关于气顶和水潜的任何信息。因此,应用MBE方法计算这种情况下的OOIP需要一些关于气顶和含水层的信息。因此,MBE给出的OOIP值与体积模拟和油藏模拟得到的OOIP值不一致。在这种情况下,信息的缺乏使得MBE方法无法使用。在计算某些参数时,利用一些相关性而忽略其他参数,试图解决这一问题。然而,这样做的结果无法达到体积和油藏模拟计算的任何封闭值,这将解释。在论文的最后,将对1970年至2020年的井况(v-4井)进行预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信