It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI

A. Papenmeier, Dagmar Kern, G. Englebienne, C. Seifert
{"title":"It’s Complicated: The Relationship between User Trust, Model Accuracy and Explanations in AI","authors":"A. Papenmeier, Dagmar Kern, G. Englebienne, C. Seifert","doi":"10.1145/3495013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated decision-making systems become increasingly powerful due to higher model complexity. While powerful in prediction accuracy, Deep Learning models are black boxes by nature, preventing users from making informed judgments about the correctness and fairness of such an automated system. Explanations have been proposed as a general remedy to the black box problem. However, it remains unclear if effects of explanations on user trust generalise over varying accuracy levels. In an online user study with 959 participants, we examined the practical consequences of adding explanations for user trust: We evaluated trust for three explanation types on three classifiers of varying accuracy. We find that the influence of our explanations on trust differs depending on the classifier’s accuracy. Thus, the interplay between trust and explanations is more complex than previously reported. Our findings also reveal discrepancies between self-reported and behavioural trust, showing that the choice of trust measure impacts the results.","PeriodicalId":322583,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3495013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Automated decision-making systems become increasingly powerful due to higher model complexity. While powerful in prediction accuracy, Deep Learning models are black boxes by nature, preventing users from making informed judgments about the correctness and fairness of such an automated system. Explanations have been proposed as a general remedy to the black box problem. However, it remains unclear if effects of explanations on user trust generalise over varying accuracy levels. In an online user study with 959 participants, we examined the practical consequences of adding explanations for user trust: We evaluated trust for three explanation types on three classifiers of varying accuracy. We find that the influence of our explanations on trust differs depending on the classifier’s accuracy. Thus, the interplay between trust and explanations is more complex than previously reported. Our findings also reveal discrepancies between self-reported and behavioural trust, showing that the choice of trust measure impacts the results.
复杂:人工智能中用户信任、模型准确性和解释之间的关系
由于模型复杂性的提高,自动化决策系统变得越来越强大。虽然深度学习模型在预测准确性方面很强大,但它本质上是黑盒子,阻止用户对这种自动化系统的正确性和公平性做出明智的判断。解释已被提出作为对黑匣子问题的一般补救措施。然而,目前尚不清楚解释对用户信任的影响是否会在不同的准确性水平上普遍化。在一项有959名参与者的在线用户研究中,我们检查了为用户信任添加解释的实际后果:我们在三个不同精度的分类器上评估了三种解释类型的信任。我们发现,我们的解释对信任的影响取决于分类器的准确性。因此,信任和解释之间的相互作用比之前报道的更为复杂。我们的研究结果还揭示了自我报告和行为信任之间的差异,表明信任措施的选择影响了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信