Applications of qualitative content analysis: evaluating the reliability and quality of health information websites

Meenakshi Venkatasubramanian
{"title":"Applications of qualitative content analysis: evaluating the reliability and quality of health information websites","authors":"Meenakshi Venkatasubramanian","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2020.1853206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health information websites have become an increasingly important source of information about medicine and health for non-specialists, patients, and consumers. But questions exist about the reliability of the information on such sites. Qualitative content analysis is a useful research methodology for analyzing the reliability of medical content on health information websites. Using a six-step qualitative research method loosely based on John Creswell's guidelines inResearch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, a sample was generated, coded, described, and analyzed in qualitative terms. By developing reliability codes and scoring a sample of health information websites based on the codes, it was possible to rank ten different health information websites in order of reliability and derive some conclusions about website reliability criteria. Other features contributing to a health website’s quality and reliability are also discussed, such as the presence or absence of privacy policies, editorial policies, reliability seals, and and similar markers. The article takes a positive view of health information websites and sees them as a useful and necessary supplement to the face-to-face expertise provided by medical professionals and physicians in an increasingly digitized world. They also facilitate a more negotiated model of communication than traditional top-down, technocratic models of information sharing.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1853206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Health information websites have become an increasingly important source of information about medicine and health for non-specialists, patients, and consumers. But questions exist about the reliability of the information on such sites. Qualitative content analysis is a useful research methodology for analyzing the reliability of medical content on health information websites. Using a six-step qualitative research method loosely based on John Creswell's guidelines inResearch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, a sample was generated, coded, described, and analyzed in qualitative terms. By developing reliability codes and scoring a sample of health information websites based on the codes, it was possible to rank ten different health information websites in order of reliability and derive some conclusions about website reliability criteria. Other features contributing to a health website’s quality and reliability are also discussed, such as the presence or absence of privacy policies, editorial policies, reliability seals, and and similar markers. The article takes a positive view of health information websites and sees them as a useful and necessary supplement to the face-to-face expertise provided by medical professionals and physicians in an increasingly digitized world. They also facilitate a more negotiated model of communication than traditional top-down, technocratic models of information sharing.
定性内容分析的应用:评价健康信息网站的可靠性和质量
健康信息网站已经成为非专业人士、患者和消费者获取医药和健康信息的一个日益重要的来源。但这些网站上信息的可靠性存在问题。定性内容分析是分析健康信息网站医学内容可靠性的一种有用的研究方法。根据John Creswell在《研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法》一书中的指导原则,采用六步定性研究方法,生成样本,对样本进行编码、描述和定性分析。通过制定可靠性代码,并基于代码对健康信息网站样本进行评分,可以对10个不同的健康信息网站进行可靠性排序,并得出网站可靠性标准的一些结论。本文还讨论了影响健康网站质量和可靠性的其他特征,例如是否存在隐私政策、编辑政策、可靠性印章和类似标记。这篇文章对健康信息网站持积极的看法,认为它们是医学专业人员和医生在日益数字化的世界中提供面对面专业知识的有用和必要的补充。与传统的自上而下、技术官僚式的信息共享模式相比,它们还促进了一种更具协商性的沟通模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信