Influence of training environment and cognitive deficits on use of feedback for motor learning in chronic stroke

Sandeep K Subramanian, G. Chilingaryan, M. Levin, H. Sveistrup
{"title":"Influence of training environment and cognitive deficits on use of feedback for motor learning in chronic stroke","authors":"Sandeep K Subramanian, G. Chilingaryan, M. Levin, H. Sveistrup","doi":"10.1109/ICVR.2015.7358582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback provision is an essential component of motor learning for improving upper limb recovery in people with stroke. Along with sensorimotor impairments, many individuals post-stroke have cognitive deficits that can influence arm motor recovery. However, few studies have identified whether the training environment and presence of cognitive deficits influences the ability to use feedback in individuals post-stroke. We evaluated the influence of the training environment and cognitive impairments on the ability to use feedback to enhance arm motor recovery. Twenty-four subjects with chronic post-stroke upper limb hemiparesis were randomized to practice pointing movements in a 3D virtual environment (VE) or a similarly designed physical environment (PE; n=12/group) for 12 sessions (72 trials/session, 3 days/week). All participants were provided with feedback about movement speed (Knowledge of Results) and trunk displacement (Knowledge of Performance). Neurocognitive functioning was assessed only before task practice (PRE), while kinematic assessments were carried out at PRE, immediately after (POST) and 3 months (RET) after task practice. Repeated measures ANOVAs with mixed models assessed the changes in kinematic outcomes. Neurocognitive function was correlated with kinematic outcomes. Those training in the VE had greater endpoint speed and ranges of shoulder horizontal adduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension. They also tended to use less trunk displacement. Kinematic deficits influenced the ability to use feedback in people with chronic stroke for upper limb motor learning and recovery. Information about the presence of these deficits can help in the selection of the most appropriate interventions for maximizing arm motor recovery and motor learning in chronic stroke.","PeriodicalId":194703,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2015.7358582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Feedback provision is an essential component of motor learning for improving upper limb recovery in people with stroke. Along with sensorimotor impairments, many individuals post-stroke have cognitive deficits that can influence arm motor recovery. However, few studies have identified whether the training environment and presence of cognitive deficits influences the ability to use feedback in individuals post-stroke. We evaluated the influence of the training environment and cognitive impairments on the ability to use feedback to enhance arm motor recovery. Twenty-four subjects with chronic post-stroke upper limb hemiparesis were randomized to practice pointing movements in a 3D virtual environment (VE) or a similarly designed physical environment (PE; n=12/group) for 12 sessions (72 trials/session, 3 days/week). All participants were provided with feedback about movement speed (Knowledge of Results) and trunk displacement (Knowledge of Performance). Neurocognitive functioning was assessed only before task practice (PRE), while kinematic assessments were carried out at PRE, immediately after (POST) and 3 months (RET) after task practice. Repeated measures ANOVAs with mixed models assessed the changes in kinematic outcomes. Neurocognitive function was correlated with kinematic outcomes. Those training in the VE had greater endpoint speed and ranges of shoulder horizontal adduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension. They also tended to use less trunk displacement. Kinematic deficits influenced the ability to use feedback in people with chronic stroke for upper limb motor learning and recovery. Information about the presence of these deficits can help in the selection of the most appropriate interventions for maximizing arm motor recovery and motor learning in chronic stroke.
训练环境和认知缺陷对慢性脑卒中患者运动学习反馈的影响
反馈提供是运动学习的一个重要组成部分,以改善上肢康复的人中风。随着感觉运动障碍,许多中风后的人有认知缺陷,这可能影响手臂运动恢复。然而,很少有研究确定训练环境和认知缺陷的存在是否会影响中风后个体使用反馈的能力。我们评估了训练环境和认知障碍对使用反馈增强手臂运动恢复能力的影响。24名慢性中风后上肢偏瘫患者被随机分配到3D虚拟环境(VE)或类似设计的物理环境(PE;N =12/组),共12个疗程(72次试验/次,3天/周)。所有参与者都获得了关于运动速度(结果知识)和躯干位移(性能知识)的反馈。仅在任务练习前(PRE)评估神经认知功能,而在任务练习前(PRE)、后(POST)和任务练习后3个月(RET)进行运动学评估。混合模型的重复测量方差分析评估了运动学结果的变化。神经认知功能与运动结果相关。在VE训练的患者有更大的终点速度和肩关节水平内收、肩关节屈曲和肘关节伸展的范围。他们也倾向于使用较少的躯干位移。运动缺陷影响慢性中风患者上肢运动学习和恢复使用反馈的能力。关于这些缺陷存在的信息可以帮助选择最合适的干预措施,以最大限度地提高慢性中风患者的手臂运动恢复和运动学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信