Failure in Stock Price Prediction: A Comparison bettwen the Curve-Shape-Feature and Non-Curve-Shape-Feature Modes of Existing Machine Learning Algorithms

Ping Zhang, Jia-Yao Yang, Hao Zhu, Yue-Jie Hou, Yi Liu, Chi-Chun Zhou
{"title":"Failure in Stock Price Prediction: A Comparison bettwen the Curve-Shape-Feature and Non-Curve-Shape-Feature Modes of Existing Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Ping Zhang, Jia-Yao Yang, Hao Zhu, Yue-Jie Hou, Yi Liu, Chi-Chun Zhou","doi":"10.15837/ijccc.2021.6.4549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of artificial intelligence, machine learning methods are successfully used in various fields. Machine learning has attracted extensive attention from investors in the financial market, especially in stock price prediction. However, one argument for the machine learning methods used in stock price prediction is that they are black-box models which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, we focus on the future stock price prediction with the historical stock price by machine learning and deep learning methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), Bayesian classifier (BC), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM), the embedded CNN, and the embedded BiLSTM. Firstly, we manually design several financial time series where the future price correlates with the historical stock prices in pre-designed modes, namely the curve-shape-feature (CSF) and the non-curve-shape-feature (NCSF) modes. In the CSF mode, the future prices can be extracted from the curve shapes of the historical stock prices. Conversely, in the NCSF mode, they can’t. Secondly, we apply various algorithms to those pre-designed and real financial time series. We find that the existing machine learning and deep learning algorithms fail in stock price prediction because in the real financial time series, less information of future prices is contained in the CSF mode, and perhaps more information is contained in the NCSF. Various machine learning and deep learning algorithms are good at handling the CSF in historical data, which are successfully applied in image recognition and natural language processing. However, they are inappropriate for stock price prediction on account of the NCSF. Therefore, accurate stock price prediction is the key to successful investment, and new machine learning algorithms handling the NCSF series are needed. \n","PeriodicalId":179619,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2021.6.4549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, machine learning methods are successfully used in various fields. Machine learning has attracted extensive attention from investors in the financial market, especially in stock price prediction. However, one argument for the machine learning methods used in stock price prediction is that they are black-box models which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, we focus on the future stock price prediction with the historical stock price by machine learning and deep learning methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), Bayesian classifier (BC), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM), the embedded CNN, and the embedded BiLSTM. Firstly, we manually design several financial time series where the future price correlates with the historical stock prices in pre-designed modes, namely the curve-shape-feature (CSF) and the non-curve-shape-feature (NCSF) modes. In the CSF mode, the future prices can be extracted from the curve shapes of the historical stock prices. Conversely, in the NCSF mode, they can’t. Secondly, we apply various algorithms to those pre-designed and real financial time series. We find that the existing machine learning and deep learning algorithms fail in stock price prediction because in the real financial time series, less information of future prices is contained in the CSF mode, and perhaps more information is contained in the NCSF. Various machine learning and deep learning algorithms are good at handling the CSF in historical data, which are successfully applied in image recognition and natural language processing. However, they are inappropriate for stock price prediction on account of the NCSF. Therefore, accurate stock price prediction is the key to successful investment, and new machine learning algorithms handling the NCSF series are needed.
股票价格预测的失败:现有机器学习算法中曲线-形状-特征与非曲线-形状-特征模式的比较
在人工智能时代,机器学习方法成功应用于各个领域。机器学习已经引起了金融市场投资者的广泛关注,尤其是在股票价格预测方面。然而,对于在股票价格预测中使用的机器学习方法的一个争论是,它们是难以解释的黑箱模型。本文主要研究了基于历史股票价格的未来股票价格预测的机器学习和深度学习方法,如支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、贝叶斯分类器(BC)、决策树(DT)、多层感知器(MLP)、卷积神经网络(CNN)、双向长短期记忆(BiLSTM)、嵌入式CNN和嵌入式BiLSTM。首先,我们人工设计了几个金融时间序列,其中未来价格与历史股票价格在预先设计的模式下相关,即曲线形状特征(CSF)和非曲线形状特征(NCSF)模式。在CSF模型中,未来的价格可以从历史股票价格的曲线形状中提取出来。相反,在NCSF模式中,它们不能。其次,我们将各种算法应用于预先设计的和真实的金融时间序列。我们发现,现有的机器学习和深度学习算法在股票价格预测中是失败的,因为在真实的金融时间序列中,CSF模式中包含的未来价格信息较少,而NCSF模式中包含的信息可能更多。各种机器学习和深度学习算法都擅长处理历史数据中的CSF,并成功应用于图像识别和自然语言处理。但是,由于NCSF的存在,它们不适合用于股价预测。因此,准确的股价预测是投资成功的关键,需要新的机器学习算法来处理NCSF序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信