Impact of protected areas on the livelihood of locals: A case study in Saadani National Park, Tanzania

F. P. Mbise, B. Moshi, E. Røskaft
{"title":"Impact of protected areas on the livelihood of locals: A case study in Saadani National Park, Tanzania","authors":"F. P. Mbise, B. Moshi, E. Røskaft","doi":"10.5897/ijbc2021.1474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We randomly selected 200 households from the four villages (50 per village) based on the household distance from the park: villages settled close to the park and villages settled further away from the park. Besides, qualitative methods including focus group discussions and direct observations, were used. Community activities differed between the two groups of villages (close and far from the park). Furthermore, local communities benefited directly and indirectly from employment, ecotourism, and support through social services. Education level was a significant factor influencing the perception of the benefits gained from the park. Crop raiding was the biggest problem reported by most people in the study area (31.5%, n = 200), followed by livestock losses. This study revealed that the establishment and expansion of a protected area can have positive and negative socio-economic, cultural, and political impacts on the livelihoods of local people. Households close to the park had little access to land; thus, few of them practiced agricultural activities and had crop production incomes. The needs of local people and poverty alleviation should be considered as important factors during the planning and designation of protected areas (PAs) in order to meet conservation and livelihood goals. The objective of the present study was to assess the perceptions of impact of PAs on the livelihoods of local people in terms of costs and benefits in the area adjacent to Saadani National Park in Tanzania with those not adjacent to Saadani NP. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Attitudes benefit sharing, livelihood, local communities, protected areas.","PeriodicalId":143839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2021.1474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We randomly selected 200 households from the four villages (50 per village) based on the household distance from the park: villages settled close to the park and villages settled further away from the park. Besides, qualitative methods including focus group discussions and direct observations, were used. Community activities differed between the two groups of villages (close and far from the park). Furthermore, local communities benefited directly and indirectly from employment, ecotourism, and support through social services. Education level was a significant factor influencing the perception of the benefits gained from the park. Crop raiding was the biggest problem reported by most people in the study area (31.5%, n = 200), followed by livestock losses. This study revealed that the establishment and expansion of a protected area can have positive and negative socio-economic, cultural, and political impacts on the livelihoods of local people. Households close to the park had little access to land; thus, few of them practiced agricultural activities and had crop production incomes. The needs of local people and poverty alleviation should be considered as important factors during the planning and designation of protected areas (PAs) in order to meet conservation and livelihood goals. The objective of the present study was to assess the perceptions of impact of PAs on the livelihoods of local people in terms of costs and benefits in the area adjacent to Saadani National Park in Tanzania with those not adjacent to Saadani NP.   Key words: Attitudes benefit sharing, livelihood, local communities, protected areas.
保护区对当地人生计的影响:以坦桑尼亚萨达尼国家公园为例
我们根据住户与公园的距离,从四个村庄随机抽取200户住户(每个村庄50户):居住在靠近公园的村庄和远离公园的村庄。此外,还采用了焦点小组讨论和直接观察等定性方法。两组村庄(离公园近和远)的社区活动有所不同。此外,当地社区直接或间接地从就业、生态旅游和社会服务支持中受益。受教育程度是影响市民对公园利益认知的重要因素。研究区域大多数人报告的最大问题是作物袭击(31.5%,n = 200),其次是牲畜损失。该研究表明,保护区的建立和扩大对当地人民的生计产生积极和消极的社会经济、文化和政治影响。靠近公园的家庭几乎没有土地;因此,他们中很少有人从事农业活动并有作物生产收入。在规划和指定保护区时,应将当地人民的需要和减轻贫困作为重要因素,以实现保护和生计目标。本研究的目的是评估在坦桑尼亚萨达尼国家公园附近地区和不毗邻萨达尼国家公园的地区,保护区对当地人民生计的成本和收益影响的看法。关键词:态度利益分享;生计;地方社区;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信