The Impact of Skin Type and Area on Skin Rejection in Limb Transplantation

T. Hautz, D. Wolfram, N. Eberhart, H. Hackl, F. Messner, A. Weissenbacher, Michael Kimelman, B. Zelger, B. Zelger, S. Schneeberger
{"title":"The Impact of Skin Type and Area on Skin Rejection in Limb Transplantation","authors":"T. Hautz, D. Wolfram, N. Eberhart, H. Hackl, F. Messner, A. Weissenbacher, Michael Kimelman, B. Zelger, B. Zelger, S. Schneeberger","doi":"10.4161/23723505.2014.973795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atypical manifestation of skin rejection observed in a series of hand transplant recipients suggests that appearance and mechanisms of rejection may vary and depend on skin type and location. We herein characterize skin rejection and inflammation at 3 defined areas of a rat hind-limb allograft. Allograft skin was harvested at the thigh, dorsum and planta pedis on postoperative day 5 and analyzed for histopathology, T-cell composition and expression of cytokines associated with skin inflammation. Isografts and naïve animals served as controls. Histology of the allograft skin collected on day 5 showed a diffuse cell infiltrate in the dermis and at the dermal-epidermal interface in the thigh and dorsum, whereas in the planta pedis it was mainly located perivascularly in the dermis. At all areas, epidermal involvement such as apoptotic keratinocytes and infiltrating lymphocytes were observed. Isograft skin showed only very mild or no signs of inflammation at all 3 locations. No significant difference was observed in the proportion of skin infiltrating CD45+CD3+CD4+ T-cells and CD45+CD3+CD8+ T-cells between the 3 sampling areas. Significant differences in cytokine protein expression were observed between hair bearing (thigh, dorsum) and hairless (planta pedis) skin, but not between the thigh and the dorsum (both hair bearing). MCP-1, IL-4, and GRO-KC exhibited the greatest individual expression at both locations thigh and dorsum in comparison with planta pedis. Differences in histopathologic appearance and cytokine expression in skin suggest area-specific mechanisms of rejection in a limb allograft, which should be considered for assessment and treatment of rejection.","PeriodicalId":372758,"journal":{"name":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/23723505.2014.973795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Atypical manifestation of skin rejection observed in a series of hand transplant recipients suggests that appearance and mechanisms of rejection may vary and depend on skin type and location. We herein characterize skin rejection and inflammation at 3 defined areas of a rat hind-limb allograft. Allograft skin was harvested at the thigh, dorsum and planta pedis on postoperative day 5 and analyzed for histopathology, T-cell composition and expression of cytokines associated with skin inflammation. Isografts and naïve animals served as controls. Histology of the allograft skin collected on day 5 showed a diffuse cell infiltrate in the dermis and at the dermal-epidermal interface in the thigh and dorsum, whereas in the planta pedis it was mainly located perivascularly in the dermis. At all areas, epidermal involvement such as apoptotic keratinocytes and infiltrating lymphocytes were observed. Isograft skin showed only very mild or no signs of inflammation at all 3 locations. No significant difference was observed in the proportion of skin infiltrating CD45+CD3+CD4+ T-cells and CD45+CD3+CD8+ T-cells between the 3 sampling areas. Significant differences in cytokine protein expression were observed between hair bearing (thigh, dorsum) and hairless (planta pedis) skin, but not between the thigh and the dorsum (both hair bearing). MCP-1, IL-4, and GRO-KC exhibited the greatest individual expression at both locations thigh and dorsum in comparison with planta pedis. Differences in histopathologic appearance and cytokine expression in skin suggest area-specific mechanisms of rejection in a limb allograft, which should be considered for assessment and treatment of rejection.
皮肤类型和面积对肢体移植皮肤排斥反应的影响
在一系列手部移植受者中观察到的非典型皮肤排斥表现表明,排斥的外观和机制可能因皮肤类型和位置而异。我们在此描述了大鼠后肢异体移植的3个确定区域的皮肤排斥反应和炎症。术后第5天在大腿、背和跖处采集同种异体皮肤,分析组织病理学、t细胞组成和皮肤炎症相关细胞因子的表达。同种移植物和naïve动物作为对照。第5天采集的同种异体皮肤组织学显示,在大腿和背部的真皮和真皮-表皮界面处有弥漫性细胞浸润,而在足底,细胞浸润主要位于真皮血管周围。所有区域均可见表皮受累,如角化细胞凋亡和淋巴细胞浸润。同种异体移植皮肤在所有三个部位仅显示非常轻微或没有炎症迹象。3个采样区皮肤浸润CD45+CD3+CD4+ t细胞和CD45+CD3+CD8+ t细胞的比例差异无统计学意义。细胞因子蛋白的表达在有毛(大腿、背部)和无毛(跖)皮肤之间有显著差异,而在大腿和背部(两种毛发)之间无显著差异。MCP-1、IL-4和GRO-KC在大腿和背部的个体表达量均高于跖部。皮肤组织病理外观和细胞因子表达的差异提示肢体同种异体移植排斥反应的区域特异性机制,这应该被考虑到排斥反应的评估和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信