The Medieval Mind in "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight"

Dean Loganbill
{"title":"The Medieval Mind in \"Sir Gawain and the Green Knight\"","authors":"Dean Loganbill","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1972.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been recognized for some time that primitive man's relationship to the world was somewhat different from our own. His relationship is usually referred to by us as one of \"participation\" since he apparently lacked the strong sense of personal identity which characterizes modem man, and saw himself as much more a part of the world around him. His sense of identity lay in his relationship to his gods as established through ritual, which is the essence of his religion and which is eventually systemized into what we recognize as myth. The importance of myth and ritual to the life of the primitive cannot be overstressed. Mircea Eliade states in Cosmos and History that, \"among primitives, not only do rituals have their mythical model but any human act whatever acquires effectiveness to the extent to which it exactly repeats an act performed at the beginning of time by a god, a hero, or an ancestor.\"1 The primitive's sense of what is real and of his own identity were intimately associated with ritual. Eliade remarks that, \"An object or an act becomes real only insofar as it imitates or repeats an archetype. Thus, reality is acquired solely through repetition or participation; everything which lacks an exemplary model is 'meaningless,' i.e., it lacks reality . . . he (the primitive) sees himself as real, i.e., as 'truly himself,' only, and precisely, insofar as he ceases to be so.\"2 The transitional nature of the medieval mind accounts at least in part for the peculiar mixture of myth, legend, and history in earlier English histories. Probably all of the romances as well as the histories have both mythical and modem elements since the very concepts of history and hterature as written expression require a degree of modem sensibility. One of the characteristics of the earliest hterature is a lack of interest in form as such. Since the myth is considered simply to be \"true,\" to impose a form upon it would be, to the mind of the primitive, a violation of reality. It therefore follows that in primitive hterature there is much that we would","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1972.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It has been recognized for some time that primitive man's relationship to the world was somewhat different from our own. His relationship is usually referred to by us as one of "participation" since he apparently lacked the strong sense of personal identity which characterizes modem man, and saw himself as much more a part of the world around him. His sense of identity lay in his relationship to his gods as established through ritual, which is the essence of his religion and which is eventually systemized into what we recognize as myth. The importance of myth and ritual to the life of the primitive cannot be overstressed. Mircea Eliade states in Cosmos and History that, "among primitives, not only do rituals have their mythical model but any human act whatever acquires effectiveness to the extent to which it exactly repeats an act performed at the beginning of time by a god, a hero, or an ancestor."1 The primitive's sense of what is real and of his own identity were intimately associated with ritual. Eliade remarks that, "An object or an act becomes real only insofar as it imitates or repeats an archetype. Thus, reality is acquired solely through repetition or participation; everything which lacks an exemplary model is 'meaningless,' i.e., it lacks reality . . . he (the primitive) sees himself as real, i.e., as 'truly himself,' only, and precisely, insofar as he ceases to be so."2 The transitional nature of the medieval mind accounts at least in part for the peculiar mixture of myth, legend, and history in earlier English histories. Probably all of the romances as well as the histories have both mythical and modem elements since the very concepts of history and hterature as written expression require a degree of modem sensibility. One of the characteristics of the earliest hterature is a lack of interest in form as such. Since the myth is considered simply to be "true," to impose a form upon it would be, to the mind of the primitive, a violation of reality. It therefore follows that in primitive hterature there is much that we would
《高文爵士与绿衣骑士》中的中世纪思想
一段时间以来,人们已经认识到,原始人与世界的关系与我们自己的关系有些不同。他的关系通常被我们称为一种“参与”,因为他显然缺乏现代人特有的强烈的个人认同感,并且认为自己更多地是他周围世界的一部分。他的身份感在于他与神的关系,这种关系是通过仪式建立起来的,这是他的宗教的本质,最终被系统化,成为我们所认识的神话。神话和仪式对原始人生活的重要性怎么强调都不为过。米尔恰·埃利亚德在《宇宙与历史》中写道,“在原人当中,不仅仪式有其神话模式,而且任何人类行为,无论在何种程度上,只要它准确地重复了上帝、英雄或祖先在时间之初所做的行为,就能获得有效性。”原始人对真实的感觉和对自己身份的认识与仪式密切相关。Eliade评论道,“一个对象或一个行为只有在模仿或重复一个原型时才会成为现实。因此,现实只能通过重复或参与来获得;任何缺乏模范的东西都是‘无意义的’,也就是说,它缺乏现实……他(原始人)认为自己是真实的,也就是说,只有当他不再是真实的自己时,他才认为自己是“真正的自己”。中世纪思想的过渡性质至少在一定程度上解释了早期英国历史中神话、传说和历史的奇特混合。也许所有的浪漫故事和历史都有神话和现代元素,因为历史和文学的概念作为书面表达需要一定程度的现代情感。早期文学的特点之一是对形式本身缺乏兴趣。既然神话被简单地认为是“真实的”,那么在原始人的头脑中,强加一种形式将是对现实的违背。因此,在原始的自然中,有许多东西是我们想要的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信