{"title":"The Medieval Mind in \"Sir Gawain and the Green Knight\"","authors":"Dean Loganbill","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1972.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been recognized for some time that primitive man's relationship to the world was somewhat different from our own. His relationship is usually referred to by us as one of \"participation\" since he apparently lacked the strong sense of personal identity which characterizes modem man, and saw himself as much more a part of the world around him. His sense of identity lay in his relationship to his gods as established through ritual, which is the essence of his religion and which is eventually systemized into what we recognize as myth. The importance of myth and ritual to the life of the primitive cannot be overstressed. Mircea Eliade states in Cosmos and History that, \"among primitives, not only do rituals have their mythical model but any human act whatever acquires effectiveness to the extent to which it exactly repeats an act performed at the beginning of time by a god, a hero, or an ancestor.\"1 The primitive's sense of what is real and of his own identity were intimately associated with ritual. Eliade remarks that, \"An object or an act becomes real only insofar as it imitates or repeats an archetype. Thus, reality is acquired solely through repetition or participation; everything which lacks an exemplary model is 'meaningless,' i.e., it lacks reality . . . he (the primitive) sees himself as real, i.e., as 'truly himself,' only, and precisely, insofar as he ceases to be so.\"2 The transitional nature of the medieval mind accounts at least in part for the peculiar mixture of myth, legend, and history in earlier English histories. Probably all of the romances as well as the histories have both mythical and modem elements since the very concepts of history and hterature as written expression require a degree of modem sensibility. One of the characteristics of the earliest hterature is a lack of interest in form as such. Since the myth is considered simply to be \"true,\" to impose a form upon it would be, to the mind of the primitive, a violation of reality. It therefore follows that in primitive hterature there is much that we would","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1972.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
It has been recognized for some time that primitive man's relationship to the world was somewhat different from our own. His relationship is usually referred to by us as one of "participation" since he apparently lacked the strong sense of personal identity which characterizes modem man, and saw himself as much more a part of the world around him. His sense of identity lay in his relationship to his gods as established through ritual, which is the essence of his religion and which is eventually systemized into what we recognize as myth. The importance of myth and ritual to the life of the primitive cannot be overstressed. Mircea Eliade states in Cosmos and History that, "among primitives, not only do rituals have their mythical model but any human act whatever acquires effectiveness to the extent to which it exactly repeats an act performed at the beginning of time by a god, a hero, or an ancestor."1 The primitive's sense of what is real and of his own identity were intimately associated with ritual. Eliade remarks that, "An object or an act becomes real only insofar as it imitates or repeats an archetype. Thus, reality is acquired solely through repetition or participation; everything which lacks an exemplary model is 'meaningless,' i.e., it lacks reality . . . he (the primitive) sees himself as real, i.e., as 'truly himself,' only, and precisely, insofar as he ceases to be so."2 The transitional nature of the medieval mind accounts at least in part for the peculiar mixture of myth, legend, and history in earlier English histories. Probably all of the romances as well as the histories have both mythical and modem elements since the very concepts of history and hterature as written expression require a degree of modem sensibility. One of the characteristics of the earliest hterature is a lack of interest in form as such. Since the myth is considered simply to be "true," to impose a form upon it would be, to the mind of the primitive, a violation of reality. It therefore follows that in primitive hterature there is much that we would