Thoughts on Estate of Richmond Tax Court Case

John Byrne
{"title":"Thoughts on Estate of Richmond Tax Court Case","authors":"John Byrne","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-34.3.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case Estate of Helen P. Richmond, Deceased, Amanda Zerbey, Executrix, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, T.C. Memo 2014-26, was not your ordinary family limited partnership tax court case. The subject interest was a noncontrolling interest in a C corporation that held only marketable securities with significant built-in capital gains (BICGs). The case was heard in the 3rd Circuit, which—unlike the 5th and 11th Circuits that had previously accepted a dollar-for-dollar reduction in value for the BICG tax—had not ruled on this issue. Another interesting issue was the selection of the valuation approach; the estate expert relied on the income approach, whereas the IRS expert relied on the asset approach. This article comments on weaknesses in the court's valuation approach and why the income approach is a valid method when valuing a noncontrolling interest.","PeriodicalId":138737,"journal":{"name":"Business Valuation Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Valuation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5791/0882-2875-34.3.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case Estate of Helen P. Richmond, Deceased, Amanda Zerbey, Executrix, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, T.C. Memo 2014-26, was not your ordinary family limited partnership tax court case. The subject interest was a noncontrolling interest in a C corporation that held only marketable securities with significant built-in capital gains (BICGs). The case was heard in the 3rd Circuit, which—unlike the 5th and 11th Circuits that had previously accepted a dollar-for-dollar reduction in value for the BICG tax—had not ruled on this issue. Another interesting issue was the selection of the valuation approach; the estate expert relied on the income approach, whereas the IRS expert relied on the asset approach. This article comments on weaknesses in the court's valuation approach and why the income approach is a valid method when valuing a noncontrolling interest.
关于里士满税法院遗产税案的思考
海伦·p·里士满,已故,阿曼达·泽贝,遗嘱执行人,请愿人诉国税局局长,被告,T.C.备忘录2014-26,这一案件不是普通的家庭有限合伙企业税务法庭案件。主体权益是C公司的非控制性权益,该公司只持有具有显著内置资本收益(bicg)的有价证券。该案件在第三巡回法院审理,不像第五和第十一巡回法院先前接受了对BICG税的一美元兑一美元的减免,第三巡回法院没有对这个问题作出裁决。另一个有趣的问题是估值方法的选择;房地产专家依靠收入法,而国税局专家依靠资产法。本文评论了法院评估方法的弱点,以及为什么收益法是评估非控制性权益的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信