Breaking Bad: Public Pensions and the Loss of that Old-Time Fiscal Religion

D. Smith, R. Al-Bawwab
{"title":"Breaking Bad: Public Pensions and the Loss of that Old-Time Fiscal Religion","authors":"D. Smith, R. Al-Bawwab","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2743279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Keynesian Revolution ushered in a new milieu of government deficit spending that overturned a historical tradition of balanced budgets. The historical tradition, the so-called “old-time fiscal religion,” maintained that balanced budgets ensured that those receiving the benefits of government services were also the individuals paying the taxes to cover those benefits. This provided an important taxpayer constraint on government spending. By overturning this old-time fiscal religion, the Keynesian revolution led to massive increases in government deficit spending. Keynesianism provided the intellectual support to push the costs of current government programs onto future generations. While most U.S. states have balanced budget provisions, and thus would seem to avoid this Keynesian tendency towards debt accumulation followed at the national level, the ability for states to underfund pension liabilities for state employees has broken the old-time fiscal religion even at the state level. Defined benefit pension plans, combined with the lack of transparency and misleading actuarial assumptions, have enabled state legislators and taxpayers to push the costs of future obligations made to current employees onto future taxpayers. Akin to the rise in deficit spending at the federal level, breaking the old-time fiscal religion at the state level has led to rising unfunded liability expenditures. Transitioning public pensions from defined benefit to defined contribution models would help redeem the old-time fiscal religion going forward, restoring taxpayer constraint on the growth of state and local government.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2743279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Keynesian Revolution ushered in a new milieu of government deficit spending that overturned a historical tradition of balanced budgets. The historical tradition, the so-called “old-time fiscal religion,” maintained that balanced budgets ensured that those receiving the benefits of government services were also the individuals paying the taxes to cover those benefits. This provided an important taxpayer constraint on government spending. By overturning this old-time fiscal religion, the Keynesian revolution led to massive increases in government deficit spending. Keynesianism provided the intellectual support to push the costs of current government programs onto future generations. While most U.S. states have balanced budget provisions, and thus would seem to avoid this Keynesian tendency towards debt accumulation followed at the national level, the ability for states to underfund pension liabilities for state employees has broken the old-time fiscal religion even at the state level. Defined benefit pension plans, combined with the lack of transparency and misleading actuarial assumptions, have enabled state legislators and taxpayers to push the costs of future obligations made to current employees onto future taxpayers. Akin to the rise in deficit spending at the federal level, breaking the old-time fiscal religion at the state level has led to rising unfunded liability expenditures. Transitioning public pensions from defined benefit to defined contribution models would help redeem the old-time fiscal religion going forward, restoring taxpayer constraint on the growth of state and local government.
《绝命毒师:公共养老金和旧时代财政信仰的丧失》
凯恩斯主义革命开创了政府赤字支出的新环境,颠覆了平衡预算的历史传统。历史传统,即所谓的“旧时财政宗教”,认为平衡的预算确保了那些从政府服务中受益的人也是为这些福利纳税的人。这对纳税人限制政府支出起到了重要作用。通过推翻这种旧时代的财政宗教,凯恩斯革命导致了政府赤字支出的大幅增加。凯恩斯主义为将当前政府项目的成本推给后代提供了智力支持。虽然美国大多数州都有平衡的预算规定,因此似乎可以避免国家层面上的这种凯恩斯主义倾向,即债务积累,但各州为州雇员提供养老金负债不足的能力,甚至在州层面上也打破了旧时代的财政宗教。固定收益养老金计划,再加上缺乏透明度和误导性的精算假设,使得州议员和纳税人把对当前雇员的未来义务的成本推给了未来的纳税人。与联邦政府赤字支出的增加类似,打破旧的财政宗教在州一级导致了无资金准备的负债支出的增加。将公共养老金从固定收益模式转变为固定缴款模式,将有助于挽回过去的财政信仰,恢复纳税人对州和地方政府增长的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信