Cash Transfers and Management Advice for Agriculture: Evidence from Senegal

Kate Ambler, A. de Brauw, S. Godlonton
{"title":"Cash Transfers and Management Advice for Agriculture: Evidence from Senegal","authors":"Kate Ambler, A. de Brauw, S. Godlonton","doi":"10.1093/WBER/LHZ005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyzes impacts of large, one-time cash transfers and farm management plans among farmers in Senegal. Farmers were randomized into groups receiving advisory visits; the visits and an individualized farm management plan; or the visits, the plan, and a cash transfer. After one year, crop production and livestock ownership were higher in the transfer group relative to the group that only received visits. Livestock gains persisted after two years. The evidence suggests the results were driven by increased investment, and, indeed, there is no robust evidence that the management plans alone affected agricultural outcomes.","PeriodicalId":356056,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asset Accumulation Policy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asset Accumulation Policy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/WBER/LHZ005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

This study analyzes impacts of large, one-time cash transfers and farm management plans among farmers in Senegal. Farmers were randomized into groups receiving advisory visits; the visits and an individualized farm management plan; or the visits, the plan, and a cash transfer. After one year, crop production and livestock ownership were higher in the transfer group relative to the group that only received visits. Livestock gains persisted after two years. The evidence suggests the results were driven by increased investment, and, indeed, there is no robust evidence that the management plans alone affected agricultural outcomes.
农业现金转移和管理咨询:来自塞内加尔的证据
本研究分析了大额一次性现金转移和农场管理计划对塞内加尔农民的影响。农民被随机分成接受咨询访问的小组;参观和个性化农场管理计划;或者是拜访,计划,还有现金转账。一年后,转移组的作物产量和牲畜拥有量高于只接受访问的组。牲畜产量在两年后持续增长。有证据表明,结果是由增加的投资推动的,事实上,没有强有力的证据表明,管理计划单独影响了农业成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信