Value Orientations and Off-Topic Interactions: Contradictions in American–Japanese Intercultural Telecollaboration

Tomoe Nishio, M. Nakatsugawa
{"title":"Value Orientations and Off-Topic Interactions: Contradictions in American–Japanese Intercultural Telecollaboration","authors":"Tomoe Nishio, M. Nakatsugawa","doi":"10.1558/CJ.33822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from activity theory and its notion of contradictions of various levels, the present study analyzes tensions that emerged during a six-week telecollaborative project between American learners of Japanese (AMU students) and Japanese learners of English (JPU students) regarding expectations and manners of interaction. Transpacific groups of students participated in online discussions of pre-assigned topics and a series of supplemental, reflective tasks such as in-class discussions, weekly journals, and individual interviews. Using a three-stage grounded theory data coding strategy, major contradictions were identified and analyzed. This case study presents negotiation of an emergent contradiction concerning learner expectations and manners of interaction between two transpacific groups. The object of the two JPU participants was oriented more toward exchange value and they faced a contradiction when the transpacific conversation went off-topic, while their AMU partners enjoyed it. Findings also show how the negotiation of a contradiction in an activity system undergoes expansive transformation involving a neighboring activity system.","PeriodicalId":357125,"journal":{"name":"the CALICO Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.33822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drawing from activity theory and its notion of contradictions of various levels, the present study analyzes tensions that emerged during a six-week telecollaborative project between American learners of Japanese (AMU students) and Japanese learners of English (JPU students) regarding expectations and manners of interaction. Transpacific groups of students participated in online discussions of pre-assigned topics and a series of supplemental, reflective tasks such as in-class discussions, weekly journals, and individual interviews. Using a three-stage grounded theory data coding strategy, major contradictions were identified and analyzed. This case study presents negotiation of an emergent contradiction concerning learner expectations and manners of interaction between two transpacific groups. The object of the two JPU participants was oriented more toward exchange value and they faced a contradiction when the transpacific conversation went off-topic, while their AMU partners enjoyed it. Findings also show how the negotiation of a contradiction in an activity system undergoes expansive transformation involving a neighboring activity system.
价值取向与话题外互动:美日跨文化远程合作中的矛盾
根据活动理论及其不同层次的矛盾概念,本研究分析了在为期六周的远程合作项目中,美国日语学习者(AMU学生)和日本英语学习者(JPU学生)在期望和互动方式方面出现的紧张关系。跨太平洋学生小组参与预先分配的主题的在线讨论和一系列补充的、反思的任务,如课堂讨论、周报和个人访谈。采用三阶段扎根理论数据编码策略,对主要矛盾进行了识别和分析。本案例研究呈现了两个跨太平洋群体之间关于学习者期望和互动方式的紧急矛盾的谈判。两名JPU参与者的目标更倾向于交换价值,当跨太平洋的谈话偏离主题时,他们面临着矛盾,而他们的AMU伙伴却乐在其中。研究结果还揭示了一个活动系统中矛盾的协商如何经历涉及相邻活动系统的扩张性转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信