Who Was the Author of the Essay on Commerce? A Note on Sir James Steuart's Doctrinal Sources

F. Cabrillo
{"title":"Who Was the Author of the Essay on Commerce? A Note on Sir James Steuart's Doctrinal Sources","authors":"F. Cabrillo","doi":"10.1017/S1042771600005688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of Richard Cantillon's Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General on Sir James Steuart's An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy has been discussed by historians of economic thought. It seems that several points of connection between these works can be found. But we do not know with certainty whether Steuart had read Richard Cantillon's Essai. It is sure that he had read Philip Cantillon's Analysis of Trade, since he explicitly cites this book in the Principles.' But there is not any definitive evidence to prove that he knew Richard Cantillon's masterwork. There are two quotations in Part II of Book IV of the Principles that have been considered references to R. Cantillon's Essai. In the first one. in chapter XXXVII. that describes the functioning of the bank of Amsterdam. Steuart writes: \"Many authors have written concerning this great bank of deposit: particularly, Davenant. Sir William Temple. Ricard in his Traite de Commerce revu par Struyk, the author of the Essay sur le Commerce, and Mr. Megens. in his book, which has been translated into English under the title of The Universal Merchant,' ' The second quotation can be found in Chapter XXXIX. In this chapter Steuart studies the circulation of coin and discusses the importance of the treasure of the bank of Amsterdam. He writes: \"From this I conclude that the treasure of the bank of Amsterdam is not so great as some authors, from mere conjecture have asserted.\" The author of the Essay on Commerce reckons it at four hundred millions of guilders: and the Amsterdam edition carries in the margin a correction, which gives us to understand, that it amounts to between eight and nine hundred millions. Davenant esteems it at 36 millions sterling. Mr. Megens, an author of great judgment and sagacity, esteems this treasure at no more than about 60 millions of guilders, or about 5,500,000 £ sterling; a sum (says he) wherewith great things may be done. Universal Merchant, sect. 6 1 . \" 3","PeriodicalId":123974,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600005688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of Richard Cantillon's Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General on Sir James Steuart's An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy has been discussed by historians of economic thought. It seems that several points of connection between these works can be found. But we do not know with certainty whether Steuart had read Richard Cantillon's Essai. It is sure that he had read Philip Cantillon's Analysis of Trade, since he explicitly cites this book in the Principles.' But there is not any definitive evidence to prove that he knew Richard Cantillon's masterwork. There are two quotations in Part II of Book IV of the Principles that have been considered references to R. Cantillon's Essai. In the first one. in chapter XXXVII. that describes the functioning of the bank of Amsterdam. Steuart writes: "Many authors have written concerning this great bank of deposit: particularly, Davenant. Sir William Temple. Ricard in his Traite de Commerce revu par Struyk, the author of the Essay sur le Commerce, and Mr. Megens. in his book, which has been translated into English under the title of The Universal Merchant,' ' The second quotation can be found in Chapter XXXIX. In this chapter Steuart studies the circulation of coin and discusses the importance of the treasure of the bank of Amsterdam. He writes: "From this I conclude that the treasure of the bank of Amsterdam is not so great as some authors, from mere conjecture have asserted." The author of the Essay on Commerce reckons it at four hundred millions of guilders: and the Amsterdam edition carries in the margin a correction, which gives us to understand, that it amounts to between eight and nine hundred millions. Davenant esteems it at 36 millions sterling. Mr. Megens, an author of great judgment and sagacity, esteems this treasure at no more than about 60 millions of guilders, or about 5,500,000 £ sterling; a sum (says he) wherewith great things may be done. Universal Merchant, sect. 6 1 . " 3
《商论》的作者是谁?詹姆斯·斯图尔特爵士的教义来源注解
理查德·坎蒂永的《一般商业性质论》对詹姆斯·斯图尔特爵士的《政治经济学原理研究》的影响一直被经济思想史家所讨论。似乎可以在这些作品之间找到几个连接点。但我们不确定斯图尔特是否读过理查德·坎蒂永的《随笔》。他肯定读过菲利普·坎蒂隆的《贸易分析》,因为他在《原则》中明确地引用了这本书。但没有任何确凿的证据证明他知道理查德·坎蒂隆的杰作。在《原则》第四册的第二部分中有两段引文被认为是参考了R. Cantillon的随笔。在第一个。见第三十七章。描述了阿姆斯特丹银行的运作。斯图尔特写道:“许多作家都写过关于这家大银行的文章,尤其是达文南特。威廉·邓波儿爵士。理查德在他的《商业Traite de Commerce》一书中提到了斯特鲁伊克,他是《商业论》的作者,还有梅根斯先生。他的书被译成了英文,书名为《宇宙商人》。第二段引文出现在第三十九章。在这一章中,斯图尔特研究了硬币的流通,并讨论了阿姆斯特丹银行宝藏的重要性。他写道:“由此我得出的结论是,阿姆斯特丹银行的财富并不像一些作者仅仅凭猜测所断言的那样巨大。”《商论》的作者估计它有四亿荷兰盾,阿姆斯特丹版在页边空白处作了更正,由此我们可以知道,它的数目在八九亿荷兰盾之间。达文南特认为它价值3600万英镑。麦根斯先生是一位极具判断力和智慧的作家,他认为这件珍宝的价值不超过六千万荷兰盾,约合五百五十万英镑。一笔钱(他说),用以成就大事。《环球商人》第6节“3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信