Competition among Ride Service Providers with Autonomous Vehicles

A. Ghosh, R. Berry
{"title":"Competition among Ride Service Providers with Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"A. Ghosh, R. Berry","doi":"10.23919/WiOpt56218.2022.9930527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are attractive for ride service providers (RSPs) in part because they eliminate the need to compete for human drivers. We investigate a scenario where two RSPs with AVs compete for customers. We model the problem as a game where the RSPs select prices for each origin-destination pair over multiple time periods in an underlying graph representing the customers’ desired trips. Each RSP also decides the number of AVs to be stationed at each node at each time period to serve the customers’ demands. The number of customers who avail service of a RSP depends on the price selected by the RSP and its competitor. Since the strategy choices available to a RSP depends on its competitor, we seek to compute a Generalized Nash equilibrium (GNE). We show that there may be multiple GNEs. However, when a RSP selects prices in order to deter its competitor when it is not serving a source-destination pair, the game has a potential function and admits a unique GNE. We also compare the competitive prices with a monopoly price where only one RSP is in the market. Numerically, we show that if a network consists of two equal size spatial clusters of demand where the demand between clusters is low, the RSPs may partition the market, i.e, one cluster is served by only one RSP. Hence, the competitive price may become close to the monopoly price.","PeriodicalId":228040,"journal":{"name":"2022 20th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt)","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 20th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/WiOpt56218.2022.9930527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are attractive for ride service providers (RSPs) in part because they eliminate the need to compete for human drivers. We investigate a scenario where two RSPs with AVs compete for customers. We model the problem as a game where the RSPs select prices for each origin-destination pair over multiple time periods in an underlying graph representing the customers’ desired trips. Each RSP also decides the number of AVs to be stationed at each node at each time period to serve the customers’ demands. The number of customers who avail service of a RSP depends on the price selected by the RSP and its competitor. Since the strategy choices available to a RSP depends on its competitor, we seek to compute a Generalized Nash equilibrium (GNE). We show that there may be multiple GNEs. However, when a RSP selects prices in order to deter its competitor when it is not serving a source-destination pair, the game has a potential function and admits a unique GNE. We also compare the competitive prices with a monopoly price where only one RSP is in the market. Numerically, we show that if a network consists of two equal size spatial clusters of demand where the demand between clusters is low, the RSPs may partition the market, i.e, one cluster is served by only one RSP. Hence, the competitive price may become close to the monopoly price.
乘坐服务提供商与自动驾驶汽车之间的竞争
自动驾驶汽车(AVs)对乘车服务提供商(rsp)很有吸引力,部分原因是它们消除了争夺人类驾驶员的需要。我们研究了一个场景,其中两个拥有自动驾驶汽车的rsp争夺客户。我们将该问题建模为一个博弈,其中rsp在表示客户期望行程的基础图中选择多个时间段内每个始发目的地对的价格。每个RSP还决定在每个时间段驻扎在每个节点的自动驾驶汽车数量,以满足客户的需求。使用RSP服务的客户数量取决于RSP及其竞争对手选择的价格。由于RSP可用的策略选择取决于其竞争对手,因此我们寻求计算广义纳什均衡(GNE)。我们表明可能存在多个GNEs。然而,当RSP选择价格以阻止其竞争对手时,当它不提供源-目的地对时,游戏就具有潜在功能,并承认独特的ge。我们还比较了竞争价格与市场上只有一个RSP的垄断价格。数值分析表明,如果一个网络由两个大小相等的空间需求集群组成,且集群之间的需求较低,则RSP可能会划分市场,即一个集群只由一个RSP服务。因此,竞争价格可能会接近垄断价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信