The Effects of Repeated Reading on Grade-Level Fluency Growth and Proficiency in First Grade

Mallory Wilson-Anderson, null null
{"title":"The Effects of Repeated Reading on Grade-Level Fluency Growth and Proficiency in First Grade","authors":"Mallory Wilson-Anderson, null null","doi":"10.58809/cpni1958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the country, students were identified as, “at risk” due to their lack of fluency proficiency on the Formative Assessment for Teachers (FAST). Students who did not attain grade-level fluency suffered from comprehending text, which negatively affected the process of reading to learn. Teachers actively explored fluency-building activities to continue to meet the needs of the “at risk” early childhood reading population. According to the fall 2016 FAST assessment, 26.9% of students within the building were not proficient. Due to the significance of students attaining grade-level fluency proficiency, this study investigated if implementing repeated reading instruction aided first-grade students in obtaining a significantly greater increase in word growth in grade-level reading. Repeated reading instruction utilized teacher modeling, partner reading, and independent reading in this study. The research design was an experimental design in which students were selected to participate in the experimental and control groups randomly. Twenty first-grade students were involved in this study with 10 students selected randomly from each classroom. The experimental group utilized the treatment, repeated reading instruction. The control group continued to receive small group guided reading instruction and the language arts curriculum as established by the school district. It was predicted that if repeated reading instruction was utilized daily for eight weeks, participants in the experimental group would obtain a significantly greater increase in word growth than the control condition in grade-level reading. The results of this study confirmed the prediction and showed a statistically significant difference in obtaining a greater increase in word growth in first-grade level reading..","PeriodicalId":111286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Educational Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58809/cpni1958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the country, students were identified as, “at risk” due to their lack of fluency proficiency on the Formative Assessment for Teachers (FAST). Students who did not attain grade-level fluency suffered from comprehending text, which negatively affected the process of reading to learn. Teachers actively explored fluency-building activities to continue to meet the needs of the “at risk” early childhood reading population. According to the fall 2016 FAST assessment, 26.9% of students within the building were not proficient. Due to the significance of students attaining grade-level fluency proficiency, this study investigated if implementing repeated reading instruction aided first-grade students in obtaining a significantly greater increase in word growth in grade-level reading. Repeated reading instruction utilized teacher modeling, partner reading, and independent reading in this study. The research design was an experimental design in which students were selected to participate in the experimental and control groups randomly. Twenty first-grade students were involved in this study with 10 students selected randomly from each classroom. The experimental group utilized the treatment, repeated reading instruction. The control group continued to receive small group guided reading instruction and the language arts curriculum as established by the school district. It was predicted that if repeated reading instruction was utilized daily for eight weeks, participants in the experimental group would obtain a significantly greater increase in word growth than the control condition in grade-level reading. The results of this study confirmed the prediction and showed a statistically significant difference in obtaining a greater increase in word growth in first-grade level reading..
重复阅读对一年级学生年级水平流畅性、熟练程度的影响
在全国范围内,学生被认定为“有风险”,因为他们在教师形成性评估(FAST)中缺乏流利的熟练程度。没有达到年级流利程度的学生在理解文本方面受到影响,这对阅读学习的过程产生了负面影响。教师积极探索流利度培养活动,以继续满足“风险”幼儿阅读人群的需求。根据2016年秋季FAST评估,大楼内26.9%的学生不熟练。鉴于学生达到年级水平流利熟练程度的重要性,本研究调查了实施重复阅读教学是否有助于一年级学生在年级水平阅读中获得更显著的单词增长。重复阅读教学在本研究中运用了教师建模、同伴阅读和自主阅读。本研究设计为实验设计,随机选择学生分为实验组和对照组。本研究共涉及20名一年级学生,每个班级随机抽取10名学生。实验组采用重复阅读指导治疗。对照组继续接受由学区制定的小组阅读指导和语言艺术课程。结果表明,在连续八周每天进行重复阅读教学的情况下,实验组学生在年级水平阅读上的字数增长显著高于对照组。本研究的结果证实了这一预测,并显示在一年级水平阅读中获得更大的单词增长方面存在统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书