Nonconformity Resolving Recommendations for Product Line Configuration

Hong Lu, T. Yue, Shaukat Ali, Li Zhang
{"title":"Nonconformity Resolving Recommendations for Product Line Configuration","authors":"Hong Lu, T. Yue, Shaukat Ali, Li Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2016.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of large-scale system product line engineering, manual configuration is often mandatory and therefore inevitably introduces nonconformities: violating pre-defined constraints for conformance checking. Resolving nonconformities without proper tool support is more or less random, as there are usually hundreds and thousands of configurable parameters and conformance constraints, in the context of configuring a large-scale and directly deployable system. Moreover, inter-connections among constraints and configurable parameters worsen the feasibility of manual resolving nonconformities without proper tool support. In this paper, we present an automatic approach (named as Zen-FIX) to optimally recommend solutions to resolve nonconformities using multi-objective search. Solutions recommended by Zen-FIX conform to all pre-defined constraints and are optimized in terms of maximizing the overall efficiency of an interactive product configuration process. We evaluated Zen-FIX with a real-world case study containing 52454 optimization problems, with which we evaluated seven multi-objective search algorithms. Results show that MoCell outperformed all others: CellDE, IBEA, NSGA-II, PESA2, Random, SPEA2, for most of the problems, in terms of Efficiency (a combined metric of finding optimized solutions and time performance).","PeriodicalId":155554,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2016.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In the context of large-scale system product line engineering, manual configuration is often mandatory and therefore inevitably introduces nonconformities: violating pre-defined constraints for conformance checking. Resolving nonconformities without proper tool support is more or less random, as there are usually hundreds and thousands of configurable parameters and conformance constraints, in the context of configuring a large-scale and directly deployable system. Moreover, inter-connections among constraints and configurable parameters worsen the feasibility of manual resolving nonconformities without proper tool support. In this paper, we present an automatic approach (named as Zen-FIX) to optimally recommend solutions to resolve nonconformities using multi-objective search. Solutions recommended by Zen-FIX conform to all pre-defined constraints and are optimized in terms of maximizing the overall efficiency of an interactive product configuration process. We evaluated Zen-FIX with a real-world case study containing 52454 optimization problems, with which we evaluated seven multi-objective search algorithms. Results show that MoCell outperformed all others: CellDE, IBEA, NSGA-II, PESA2, Random, SPEA2, for most of the problems, in terms of Efficiency (a combined metric of finding optimized solutions and time performance).
生产线配置的不合格解决建议
在大规模系统产品线工程的背景下,手动配置通常是强制性的,因此不可避免地引入了不符合项:违反了预先定义的一致性检查约束。在没有适当工具支持的情况下解决不一致问题或多或少是随机的,因为在配置大规模和直接可部署的系统的环境中,通常有成百上千的可配置参数和一致性约束。此外,在没有适当工具支持的情况下,约束和可配置参数之间的相互联系使人工解决不符合问题的可行性恶化。在本文中,我们提出了一种自动方法(称为Zen-FIX),通过多目标搜索来最佳推荐解决不符合问题的解决方案。Zen-FIX推荐的解决方案符合所有预定义的约束条件,并在最大化交互式产品配置过程的整体效率方面进行了优化。我们用一个包含52454个优化问题的真实案例研究来评估Zen-FIX,其中我们评估了7种多目标搜索算法。结果表明,在大多数问题上,MoCell在效率(寻找优化解决方案和时间性能的综合指标)方面优于其他所有问题:CellDE, IBEA, NSGA-II, PESA2, Random, SPEA2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信