An Evaluation of Mindful Eating, Sleep Quality, and Night Eating Syndrome of Adults

Elif Sağlam, M. A. Cebirbay
{"title":"An Evaluation of Mindful Eating, Sleep Quality, and Night Eating Syndrome of Adults","authors":"Elif Sağlam, M. A. Cebirbay","doi":"10.51972/tfsd.1108684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences that emerged with mindful eating, sleep quality, and night eating syndrome in adults. \nMaterial and Methods: A survey model was used for the study, and it included randomized selected 18-65 aged 580 adults in Konya with a questionnaire consisting of demographic and anthropometric measurements, nutrition habits, Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ-30), Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). \nResults: The mean (x̄±SE) of the MEQ-30 was found to be 3.25±0.027 in women and 3.22±0.024 men. Men’s emotional eating score is higher than women, and their eating control, awareness, and eating discipline scores are lower than women, eating control (p=0.002) and eating discipline differed (p=0.045) for BMI. Due to the NEQ scores, 59% of those at risk for Night Eating Syndrome (NES) were in women and 41% men. Mood/sleep dysfunction scores differed in gender among other sub-dimensions of NEQ (p=0.044). In PSQI total scores, good (14.06±0.372) (55.3%) and poor (14.22±0.355) (44.7%) sleep quality did not differ (p=0.771). A negative correlation was found between NEQ and MEQ-30 scores (p=0.815) and PSQI and NEQ scores (p=0.195). However, MEQ-30 and the PSQI scores showed significant differences (p=0.000), and the correlation was found to be low (r=0.024). \nConclusion: Mindful eating, and sleep quality scores may be variable according to gender and BMI, it has a relationship between mindful eating and sleep quality, which has not been determined by night eating behaviors. Therefore, it is important to consider that factors be an indicator of maintaining healthy eating habits.","PeriodicalId":239741,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Science and Health","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51972/tfsd.1108684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences that emerged with mindful eating, sleep quality, and night eating syndrome in adults. Material and Methods: A survey model was used for the study, and it included randomized selected 18-65 aged 580 adults in Konya with a questionnaire consisting of demographic and anthropometric measurements, nutrition habits, Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ-30), Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: The mean (x̄±SE) of the MEQ-30 was found to be 3.25±0.027 in women and 3.22±0.024 men. Men’s emotional eating score is higher than women, and their eating control, awareness, and eating discipline scores are lower than women, eating control (p=0.002) and eating discipline differed (p=0.045) for BMI. Due to the NEQ scores, 59% of those at risk for Night Eating Syndrome (NES) were in women and 41% men. Mood/sleep dysfunction scores differed in gender among other sub-dimensions of NEQ (p=0.044). In PSQI total scores, good (14.06±0.372) (55.3%) and poor (14.22±0.355) (44.7%) sleep quality did not differ (p=0.771). A negative correlation was found between NEQ and MEQ-30 scores (p=0.815) and PSQI and NEQ scores (p=0.195). However, MEQ-30 and the PSQI scores showed significant differences (p=0.000), and the correlation was found to be low (r=0.024). Conclusion: Mindful eating, and sleep quality scores may be variable according to gender and BMI, it has a relationship between mindful eating and sleep quality, which has not been determined by night eating behaviors. Therefore, it is important to consider that factors be an indicator of maintaining healthy eating habits.
成年人正念进食、睡眠质量和夜间进食综合症的评估
目的:本研究旨在探讨成年人在正念进食、睡眠质量和夜间进食综合症方面的差异。材料与方法:采用问卷调查模型,随机选取科尼亚地区18-65岁的580名成年人,采用人口统计学和人体测量、营养习惯、正念饮食问卷(MEQ-30)、夜间饮食问卷(NEQ)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行问卷调查。结果:MEQ-30的平均值(x′±SE)女性为3.25±0.027,男性为3.22±0.024。男性情绪化进食得分高于女性,饮食控制、意识和饮食纪律得分低于女性,饮食控制(p=0.002)和饮食纪律在BMI方面存在差异(p=0.045)。根据NEQ评分,有夜间进食综合症(NES)风险的人中有59%是女性,41%是男性。情绪/睡眠障碍得分在NEQ的其他子维度上存在性别差异(p=0.044)。在PSQI总分中,睡眠质量优者(14.06±0.372)(55.3%)与睡眠质量差者(14.22±0.355)(44.7%)差异无统计学意义(p=0.771)。NEQ与MEQ-30评分呈负相关(p=0.815), PSQI与NEQ评分呈负相关(p=0.195)。MEQ-30与PSQI评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.000),相关性较低(r=0.024)。结论:正念饮食与睡眠质量得分可能因性别和BMI而有所差异,正念饮食与睡眠质量之间存在一定的关系,这一关系尚未由夜间进食行为决定。因此,将这些因素作为保持健康饮食习惯的指标是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信