Introduction: Approaching Julian

Stefan Rebenich, Hans‐ulrich Wiemer
{"title":"Introduction: Approaching Julian","authors":"Stefan Rebenich, Hans‐ulrich Wiemer","doi":"10.1163/9789004416314_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Roman Emperor Flavius Claudius Julianus died more than one and a half millennia ago –on the 26th of June 363 AD, only 20 months after the beginning of his sole reign. Nevertheless, his figure still arouses emotions to this day, with reactions ranging from fervent admiration to strong disapproval. Whoever deals with Julian necessarily takes sides. It starts with the name: Those who use the name Julian the Apostate single out his religious attitude as the defining characteristic of his personality and his reign. Those who prefer to call him the emperor Julian place him in the long line of Roman emperors. Admirers of Julian usually hold a critical attitude towards the alliance between emperor and church that was forged by Constantine the Great, Julian’s uncle. In this camp, Julian is considered an enlightened and tolerant monarch – a philosopher in an emperor’s garb, who fought Christianity in order to preserve or rather restore Greek culture in its true, unadulterated form. He held lofty ideals and led an exemplary way of life. He was a great general and statesman: According to his admirers, Julian saved Gaul from devastation at the hands of Germanic barbarians by his spirited warfare along the Rhine. In the east, he intended to put an end to the constant attacks of the Persians through offensive military operations. Above all, however, Julian strove for a fundamental reform of the late Roman ‘coercive state’. He diminished the tax burden, reduced the court staff, curbed the central bureaucracy, and strengthened municipal self-government. Julian also wanted to reverse the tendency toward an ‘absolutist’ understanding of the empire, which does not recognize any legal restrictions. The fact that the emperor in the end utterly failed does not, on this view, reflection his aims or capabilities. His failure was rather due to a contingent event, his early death. Views like these are still held today by renowned historians. In a German handbook on the history of the late Roman Empire, one reads:","PeriodicalId":243748,"journal":{"name":"A Companion to Julian the Apostate","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Companion to Julian the Apostate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416314_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Roman Emperor Flavius Claudius Julianus died more than one and a half millennia ago –on the 26th of June 363 AD, only 20 months after the beginning of his sole reign. Nevertheless, his figure still arouses emotions to this day, with reactions ranging from fervent admiration to strong disapproval. Whoever deals with Julian necessarily takes sides. It starts with the name: Those who use the name Julian the Apostate single out his religious attitude as the defining characteristic of his personality and his reign. Those who prefer to call him the emperor Julian place him in the long line of Roman emperors. Admirers of Julian usually hold a critical attitude towards the alliance between emperor and church that was forged by Constantine the Great, Julian’s uncle. In this camp, Julian is considered an enlightened and tolerant monarch – a philosopher in an emperor’s garb, who fought Christianity in order to preserve or rather restore Greek culture in its true, unadulterated form. He held lofty ideals and led an exemplary way of life. He was a great general and statesman: According to his admirers, Julian saved Gaul from devastation at the hands of Germanic barbarians by his spirited warfare along the Rhine. In the east, he intended to put an end to the constant attacks of the Persians through offensive military operations. Above all, however, Julian strove for a fundamental reform of the late Roman ‘coercive state’. He diminished the tax burden, reduced the court staff, curbed the central bureaucracy, and strengthened municipal self-government. Julian also wanted to reverse the tendency toward an ‘absolutist’ understanding of the empire, which does not recognize any legal restrictions. The fact that the emperor in the end utterly failed does not, on this view, reflection his aims or capabilities. His failure was rather due to a contingent event, his early death. Views like these are still held today by renowned historians. In a German handbook on the history of the late Roman Empire, one reads:
引言:走近朱利安
一千五百多年前,罗马皇帝弗拉维乌斯·克劳迪亚斯·朱利亚努斯在公元363年6月26日去世,离他唯一的统治开始只有20个月。然而,直到今天,他的形象仍然引起人们的情绪,人们的反应从热烈的崇拜到强烈的反对。和朱利安打交道的人都要站队。它从名字开始:那些使用背教者朱利安这个名字的人指出他的宗教态度是他的个性和统治的决定性特征。那些喜欢称他为朱利安皇帝的人把他归入罗马皇帝的行列。朱利安的崇拜者通常对君士坦丁大帝(朱利安的叔叔)建立的皇帝与教会的联盟持批判态度。在这个阵营中,朱利安被认为是一个开明和宽容的君主——一个披着皇帝外衣的哲学家,他与基督教作斗争是为了保存或更确切地说,是为了恢复希腊文化的真实、纯粹的形式。他有崇高的理想,过着模范的生活。他是一位伟大的将军和政治家:根据他的崇拜者的说法,朱利安通过在莱茵河沿岸的英勇战斗,将高卢从日耳曼野蛮人的手中拯救出来。在东部,他打算通过进攻性军事行动来结束波斯人不断的进攻。最重要的是,朱利安致力于对罗马晚期的"强制国家"进行根本性改革。他减轻了税收负担,减少了朝廷人员,抑制了中央官僚主义,加强了地方自治。朱利安还想扭转对帝国的“绝对主义”理解的趋势,这种理解不承认任何法律限制。根据这种观点,皇帝最终彻底失败的事实并不能反映他的目标或能力。他的失败是由于一个偶然事件,即他的早逝。今天,著名的历史学家仍然持有这样的观点。在一本关于罗马帝国晚期历史的德国手册中,有人写道:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信