Paradoxical Education: Learning to Unlearn What We Think We Have Learned

Zachary Isrow
{"title":"Paradoxical Education: Learning to Unlearn What We Think We Have Learned","authors":"Zachary Isrow","doi":"10.22158/wjeh.v3n3p57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no shortage of pedagogical theories from the tradition formal methods of instruction to the free-play methods of unschooling. A sharp shift in education and instruction models took place with the introduction of critical pedagogy. The focus was no longer on the authority of the teacher and the submissive, passive approach taken by the learner, but rather on the engagement between the two. Still, even when critical pedagogy is utilized in a formal model of education something is missing from the system—experiential learning. Although the unschooling method has been criticized it does provide the benefit of experiential learning. This paper explores the nature of education and evaluates models and theories of pedagogy with the conclusion that a paradoxical approach in which there is a merger between the formal guidelines set by traditional educational models and the experiential learning methods of unschooling approach best prepares learners for the world and to be engaged citizens. Although what, precisely, this paradoxical system would entail is not discussed in this paper, it opens the door for further discussion on the topic and for consideration of the theories which have attempted to do exactly this and improve upon them going forward.","PeriodicalId":228342,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v3n3p57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no shortage of pedagogical theories from the tradition formal methods of instruction to the free-play methods of unschooling. A sharp shift in education and instruction models took place with the introduction of critical pedagogy. The focus was no longer on the authority of the teacher and the submissive, passive approach taken by the learner, but rather on the engagement between the two. Still, even when critical pedagogy is utilized in a formal model of education something is missing from the system—experiential learning. Although the unschooling method has been criticized it does provide the benefit of experiential learning. This paper explores the nature of education and evaluates models and theories of pedagogy with the conclusion that a paradoxical approach in which there is a merger between the formal guidelines set by traditional educational models and the experiential learning methods of unschooling approach best prepares learners for the world and to be engaged citizens. Although what, precisely, this paradoxical system would entail is not discussed in this paper, it opens the door for further discussion on the topic and for consideration of the theories which have attempted to do exactly this and improve upon them going forward.
矛盾的教育:学会忘记我们认为我们已经学过的东西
从传统的正式教学方法到非学校教育的自由游戏方法,都不乏教学理论。随着批判教学法的引入,教育和教学模式发生了急剧的转变。重点不再是教师的权威和学生采取的顺从、被动的方法,而是两者之间的互动。然而,即使在正式的教育模式中使用批判教学法,系统体验学习中也缺少一些东西。尽管非学校教育方法受到了批评,但它确实提供了体验式学习的好处。本文探讨了教育的本质,并评估了教育学的模型和理论,得出的结论是,一种矛盾的方法,即传统教育模式所设定的正式指导方针与非学校教育方法的体验式学习方法之间的合并,最好地为学习者做好准备,使他们成为参与其中的公民。虽然,确切地说,这一矛盾的系统将导致什么在本文中没有讨论,但它为进一步讨论这个主题和考虑那些试图做到这一点并改进它们的理论打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信