Indigenous settlements and market environmentalism: An untimely coincidence?

Fiona McCormack
{"title":"Indigenous settlements and market environmentalism: An untimely coincidence?","authors":"Fiona McCormack","doi":"10.22459/CAEPR40.07.2018.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the entanglement of indigeneity and neoliberalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand in the context of fisheries. A relationship, I argue, that is mediated by market environmentalism. This is given substance in two Acts: The Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992, which resolved commercial claims against the Crown, and the complementary Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998, which legislated for customary fishing activities. The settlement was made feasible by the implementation of new forms of enclosures in the seascape—that is, individualised property rights, ITQs (individual transferable quota).","PeriodicalId":110549,"journal":{"name":"The Neoliberal State, Recognition and Indigenous Rights","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neoliberal State, Recognition and Indigenous Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR40.07.2018.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This chapter considers the entanglement of indigeneity and neoliberalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand in the context of fisheries. A relationship, I argue, that is mediated by market environmentalism. This is given substance in two Acts: The Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992, which resolved commercial claims against the Crown, and the complementary Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998, which legislated for customary fishing activities. The settlement was made feasible by the implementation of new forms of enclosures in the seascape—that is, individualised property rights, ITQs (individual transferable quota).
土著定居点和市场环保主义:不合时宜的巧合?
本章考虑在渔业的背景下,土著和新自由主义在奥特阿瓦/新西兰的纠缠。我认为,这种关系是由市场环境主义调解的。这在两项法案中得到了具体规定:1992年《怀唐伊条约(渔业索赔)解决法》解决了对王室提出的商业索赔;1998年《补充性渔业(凯莫阿纳习惯捕鱼)条例》为习惯捕鱼活动立法。通过在海景中实施新形式的围护,即个人产权,ITQs(个人可转让配额),解决方案变得可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信