Capstone projects in computer science: evaluated by stakeholders

Juan José Olarte Larrea, C. Domínguez, F. J. G. Izquierdo, Arturo Jaime Elizondo
{"title":"Capstone projects in computer science: evaluated by stakeholders","authors":"Juan José Olarte Larrea, C. Domínguez, F. J. G. Izquierdo, Arturo Jaime Elizondo","doi":"10.1145/2591708.2602655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates several aspects related to capstone projects in a computer science degree: level of advisor involvement, type of student, and type of project. We consider the points of view of students, advisors, and evaluation committees. Students claimed the level of advisor involvement to be significantly greater than that perceived by the advisors themselves. Regarding students skills, we found no significant differences between the opinions of advisors and students. And lastly, students have a significantly better opinion about their projects than advisors do.","PeriodicalId":334476,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study evaluates several aspects related to capstone projects in a computer science degree: level of advisor involvement, type of student, and type of project. We consider the points of view of students, advisors, and evaluation committees. Students claimed the level of advisor involvement to be significantly greater than that perceived by the advisors themselves. Regarding students skills, we found no significant differences between the opinions of advisors and students. And lastly, students have a significantly better opinion about their projects than advisors do.
计算机科学的顶点项目:由利益相关者评估
本研究评估了与计算机科学学位的顶点项目相关的几个方面:指导老师的参与程度、学生的类型和项目的类型。我们考虑学生、顾问和评估委员会的观点。学生声称导师的参与程度显著高于导师自己的感受。在学生技能方面,我们发现导师和学生的意见没有显著差异。最后,学生对他们的项目有比导师更好的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信