The Gricean Cooperative Principle at Work in Fictional Narratives : the Case of Reporting Clauses

Aurélie Ceccaldi
{"title":"The Gricean Cooperative Principle at Work in Fictional Narratives : the Case of Reporting Clauses","authors":"Aurélie Ceccaldi","doi":"10.3406/ranam.2015.1494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reporting clauses (RCs) generally comply with the Gricean cooperative principle (1975) and its attendant conversational maxims within the framework of direct speech representation. RCs are commonly used in direct speech to provide additional or missing information, thus fulfilling the maxim of quantity and falling within the scope of “attributive discourse”. But many RCs appear to infringe upon the maxims. Grice argues that utterances which flout one or more of the four maxims do not truly imperil the above-mentioned principle ; on the contrary, they generate “implicatures”, or hidden meanings which can only be recovered through cooperation and interpretation. In this article, the focus is on the implicatures generated by the use of overtly transgressive RCs in literary texts, on the premise that cooperation is at work between the narrator and the reader in fiction.","PeriodicalId":440534,"journal":{"name":"Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ranam.2015.1494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reporting clauses (RCs) generally comply with the Gricean cooperative principle (1975) and its attendant conversational maxims within the framework of direct speech representation. RCs are commonly used in direct speech to provide additional or missing information, thus fulfilling the maxim of quantity and falling within the scope of “attributive discourse”. But many RCs appear to infringe upon the maxims. Grice argues that utterances which flout one or more of the four maxims do not truly imperil the above-mentioned principle ; on the contrary, they generate “implicatures”, or hidden meanings which can only be recovered through cooperation and interpretation. In this article, the focus is on the implicatures generated by the use of overtly transgressive RCs in literary texts, on the premise that cooperation is at work between the narrator and the reader in fiction.
小说叙事中的Gricean合作原则:以报道从句为例
在直接言语表达的框架下,报告从句普遍遵循Gricean合作原则(1975)及其伴随的会话准则。rc通常用于直接引语中,以提供额外或缺失的信息,从而满足数量准则,属于“定语篇”的范畴。但许多rc似乎违反了这些格言。格赖斯认为,蔑视四条格言中的一条或多条的言论并不会真正危及上述原则;相反,它们产生了“含意”,或隐藏的意义,只有通过合作和解释才能恢复。在这篇文章中,重点是在小说中叙述者和读者之间的合作的前提下,在文学文本中使用明显越界的RCs所产生的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信