Optimizing QoS, performance, and power efficiency of backup services

L. Cherkasova, A. Zhang
{"title":"Optimizing QoS, performance, and power efficiency of backup services","authors":"L. Cherkasova, A. Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SustainIT.2015.7101359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most businesses, backup is a daily operation that needs to reliably protect diverse digital assets distributed across the enterprise. Efficiently processing ever increasing amounts of data residing on multiple desktops, servers, laptops, etc., and providing dynamic recovery capabilities becomes a high priority task for many IT departments. Driven by the advances in cloud computing and Software as a Service (SaaS) delivery model, IT departments are transitioning from providing highly customized services to offering on demand services which can be requested and canceled instantly. Backup service providers must be able to react efficiently to on-demand requests and cannot afford labor intensive resource planning and manual adjustments of schedules. Our goal is to automate the design of a backup schedule that minimizes the overall completion time for a given set of backup jobs. This problem can be formulated as a resource constrained scheduling problem where a set of n jobs should be scheduled on m machines with given capacities. In this work, we compare the outcome of the integer programming formulation with a heuristic-based job scheduling algorithm, called FlexLBF. The FlexLBF schedule produces close to optimal results (reducing backup time 20%-60%) while carrying no additional computing overhead and scaling well to efficiently process large datasets compared to the IP-based solution. Moreover, FlexLBF can be easily analyzed in a simulation environment to further tune a backup server configuration for achieving given performance objectives while saving power (up to additional 50% in our experiments). It helps to avoid guess-based configuration efforts by system administrators and significantly increase the quality and reliability of implemented solutions.","PeriodicalId":229673,"journal":{"name":"2015 Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SustainIT.2015.7101359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For most businesses, backup is a daily operation that needs to reliably protect diverse digital assets distributed across the enterprise. Efficiently processing ever increasing amounts of data residing on multiple desktops, servers, laptops, etc., and providing dynamic recovery capabilities becomes a high priority task for many IT departments. Driven by the advances in cloud computing and Software as a Service (SaaS) delivery model, IT departments are transitioning from providing highly customized services to offering on demand services which can be requested and canceled instantly. Backup service providers must be able to react efficiently to on-demand requests and cannot afford labor intensive resource planning and manual adjustments of schedules. Our goal is to automate the design of a backup schedule that minimizes the overall completion time for a given set of backup jobs. This problem can be formulated as a resource constrained scheduling problem where a set of n jobs should be scheduled on m machines with given capacities. In this work, we compare the outcome of the integer programming formulation with a heuristic-based job scheduling algorithm, called FlexLBF. The FlexLBF schedule produces close to optimal results (reducing backup time 20%-60%) while carrying no additional computing overhead and scaling well to efficiently process large datasets compared to the IP-based solution. Moreover, FlexLBF can be easily analyzed in a simulation environment to further tune a backup server configuration for achieving given performance objectives while saving power (up to additional 50% in our experiments). It helps to avoid guess-based configuration efforts by system administrators and significantly increase the quality and reliability of implemented solutions.
优化备份业务的QoS、性能和功耗
对于大多数企业来说,备份是一项日常操作,需要可靠地保护分布在整个企业中的各种数字资产。有效地处理驻留在多台台式机、服务器、笔记本电脑等上的不断增加的数据量,并提供动态恢复功能,已成为许多IT部门的高优先级任务。在云计算和软件即服务(SaaS)交付模式的推动下,IT部门正在从提供高度定制的服务转变为提供可立即请求和取消的按需服务。备份服务提供商必须能够有效地响应随需应变的请求,不能承担劳动密集型的资源规划和手动调整时间表的费用。我们的目标是自动化备份计划的设计,以最小化给定备份作业集的总体完成时间。这个问题可以被表述为一个资源受限的调度问题,其中一组n个作业应该被调度到m台具有给定容量的机器上。在这项工作中,我们将整数规划公式的结果与一种称为FlexLBF的启发式作业调度算法进行了比较。与基于ip的解决方案相比,FlexLBF计划产生了接近最佳的结果(减少了20%-60%的备份时间),同时没有额外的计算开销,并且可以很好地扩展以有效地处理大型数据集。此外,可以在模拟环境中轻松地分析FlexLBF,以进一步调整备份服务器配置,以实现给定的性能目标,同时节省电力(在我们的实验中最多节省50%)。它有助于避免系统管理员进行基于猜测的配置工作,并显著提高已实现解决方案的质量和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信