Correlation of clinical manifestation of lumbar disc prolapse with magnetic resonance imaging findings among adult patients

Hamna Nasir, Muhammad Usman Sarwar, Sumair Nasim Qureshi, Manqoosh-ur-Rehman, Amjad Maqsood, Saba Saif
{"title":"Correlation of clinical manifestation of lumbar disc prolapse with magnetic resonance imaging findings among adult patients","authors":"Hamna Nasir, Muhammad Usman Sarwar, Sumair Nasim Qureshi, Manqoosh-ur-Rehman, Amjad Maqsood, Saba Saif","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v13i4.764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The most common cause of low back pain is disc prolapse. Disc prolapse occurs in both gender, but females are more prone to disc degenerative changes. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between clinical findings and MRI findings of lumbar disc prolapse patients. \nMETHODOLOGY: This study recruited 32 participants of either gender, between the ages of 19 to 65, in the Radiology department of Shalamar Hospital. This study was carried out in six months with follow-up. Only diagnosed patients with lumbar disc prolapse on MRI were recruited. NPRS was used to identify the intensity of pain. History and neurological examinations were done in all diagnosed patients. MRI reports of all these patients were reviewed. All these findings of MRI were correlated with the clinical findings at different levels of lumbar vertebrae. \nRESULTS: There was a statistically significant positive correlation of MRI findings with clinical findings in the presence of nerve root compression at the L1-L2 level of lumbar vertebrae. All abnormal findings on MRI did not correlate with clinical findings because some patients did not produce symptoms. According to the Pearson coefficient correlation, there was a positive but insignificant  (p-value≥0.05) correlation between clinical features (sensations, power and reflexes) and MRI findings at all the levels of lumbar vertebrae except L2 dermatome and myotome. \nCONCLUSION: There was a not good correlation between MRI findings and clinical findings of patients with lumbar disc prolapse except L2.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v13i4.764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The most common cause of low back pain is disc prolapse. Disc prolapse occurs in both gender, but females are more prone to disc degenerative changes. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between clinical findings and MRI findings of lumbar disc prolapse patients. METHODOLOGY: This study recruited 32 participants of either gender, between the ages of 19 to 65, in the Radiology department of Shalamar Hospital. This study was carried out in six months with follow-up. Only diagnosed patients with lumbar disc prolapse on MRI were recruited. NPRS was used to identify the intensity of pain. History and neurological examinations were done in all diagnosed patients. MRI reports of all these patients were reviewed. All these findings of MRI were correlated with the clinical findings at different levels of lumbar vertebrae. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant positive correlation of MRI findings with clinical findings in the presence of nerve root compression at the L1-L2 level of lumbar vertebrae. All abnormal findings on MRI did not correlate with clinical findings because some patients did not produce symptoms. According to the Pearson coefficient correlation, there was a positive but insignificant  (p-value≥0.05) correlation between clinical features (sensations, power and reflexes) and MRI findings at all the levels of lumbar vertebrae except L2 dermatome and myotome. CONCLUSION: There was a not good correlation between MRI findings and clinical findings of patients with lumbar disc prolapse except L2.
成人腰椎间盘突出症临床表现与磁共振成像的相关性分析
背景与目的:腰椎间盘突出是腰痛最常见的原因。男女皆可发生椎间盘脱垂,但女性更容易发生椎间盘退行性改变。本研究的目的是确定腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床表现和MRI表现之间的相关性。方法:本研究在Shalamar医院放射科招募了32名年龄在19至65岁之间的男女参与者。这项研究进行了六个月的随访。仅招募MRI诊断为腰椎间盘突出的患者。NPRS用于识别疼痛的强度。所有确诊患者均进行病史和神经学检查。我们回顾了所有患者的MRI报告。MRI表现与腰椎不同节段的临床表现均有一定的相关性。结果:腰椎L1-L2水平存在神经根压迫,MRI表现与临床表现有统计学意义的正相关。所有MRI的异常表现与临床表现不相关,因为一些患者没有出现症状。Pearson相关系数显示,除L2皮节段和肌节段外,腰椎各节段的临床特征(感觉、力量和反射)与MRI表现均呈正相关,但不显著(p值≥0.05)。结论:除L2外,腰椎间盘突出症的MRI表现与临床表现相关性不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信