The significance of psychological safety — The exploration of a moderated-mediation model

Ting-ting Sun
{"title":"The significance of psychological safety — The exploration of a moderated-mediation model","authors":"Ting-ting Sun","doi":"10.22495/cgobrv7i2p8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on self-determination theory (SDT) (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2008a, 2008b, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2000, 2017, 2019; Ryan et al., 2019, 2021) and conservation of resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 2004, 2011), this study constructed an mindfulness employee involvement (M-EI) model to explore the mechanism of enhancing psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999; Edmondson & Lei, 2014; Dekker & Edmondson, 2022) by leveraging mindfulness (Baer et al., 2006; Hou et al., 2014; Kudesia, 2019) and employee involvement practices (Lawler, 1994; Riordan et al., 2005; Wood, 2020). Specifically, the study explored whether an organization or individuals are responsible for making people feel safe, as well as how COVID-19 lockdown practices could impact the above-mentioned mechanism. A quantitative survey was conducted and analysed via structural equation modelling. The regression results supported both a positive, direct correlation between mindfulness and psychological safety and an indirect correlation via employee involvement moderated (i.e., made less positive) by COVID-19 lockdown practices. Considering the uniqueness of Chinese culture, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) 18 with a better model fit was constructed as the measurement for mindfulness. It is important to leverage both intrinsic and extrinsic factors to enhance psychological safety levels, allowing better mental health, accumulated intrinsic motivation, and greater autonomy at work for sustainable growth.","PeriodicalId":244517,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i2p8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on self-determination theory (SDT) (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2008a, 2008b, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2000, 2017, 2019; Ryan et al., 2019, 2021) and conservation of resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 2004, 2011), this study constructed an mindfulness employee involvement (M-EI) model to explore the mechanism of enhancing psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999; Edmondson & Lei, 2014; Dekker & Edmondson, 2022) by leveraging mindfulness (Baer et al., 2006; Hou et al., 2014; Kudesia, 2019) and employee involvement practices (Lawler, 1994; Riordan et al., 2005; Wood, 2020). Specifically, the study explored whether an organization or individuals are responsible for making people feel safe, as well as how COVID-19 lockdown practices could impact the above-mentioned mechanism. A quantitative survey was conducted and analysed via structural equation modelling. The regression results supported both a positive, direct correlation between mindfulness and psychological safety and an indirect correlation via employee involvement moderated (i.e., made less positive) by COVID-19 lockdown practices. Considering the uniqueness of Chinese culture, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) 18 with a better model fit was constructed as the measurement for mindfulness. It is important to leverage both intrinsic and extrinsic factors to enhance psychological safety levels, allowing better mental health, accumulated intrinsic motivation, and greater autonomy at work for sustainable growth.
心理安全的意义——一个有调节中介模型的探索
借鉴自我决定理论(SDT) (Deci & Ryan, 2000,2008a, 2008b, 1985;Ryan & Deci, 2000,2017, 2019;Ryan et al., 2019, 2021)和资源保护(COR)理论(Hobfoll, 1989, 2004, 2011),本研究构建了正念员工投入(M-EI)模型来探索增强心理安全的机制(Edmondson, 1999;Edmondson & Lei, 2014;Dekker & Edmondson, 2022)通过利用正念(Baer et al., 2006;侯等人,2014;Kudesia, 2019)和员工参与实践(Lawler, 1994;Riordan et al., 2005;木,2020)。具体来说,该研究探讨了一个组织或个人是否有责任让人们感到安全,以及COVID-19封锁措施如何影响上述机制。通过结构方程模型进行了定量调查和分析。回归结果既支持正念与心理安全之间的直接正相关,也支持通过员工参与(即不那么积极)通过COVID-19封锁措施缓和的间接相关。考虑到中国文化的独特性,我们构建了模型拟合较好的五面正念问卷(FFMQ) 18作为正念的测量。重要的是要利用内在和外在因素来提高心理安全水平,从而实现更好的心理健康、积累内在动力和更大的工作自主权,以实现可持续增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信