Towards Simulation-Data Science – A Case Study on Material Failures

Holger Trittenbach, M. Gauch, Klemens Böhm, K. Schulz
{"title":"Towards Simulation-Data Science – A Case Study on Material Failures","authors":"Holger Trittenbach, M. Gauch, Klemens Böhm, K. Schulz","doi":"10.1109/DSAA.2018.00058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulations let scientists study properties of complex systems. At first sight, data mining is a good choice when evaluating large numbers of simulations. But it is currently unclear whether there are general principles that might guide the deployment of respective methods to simulation data. In other words, is it worthwhile to target at simulation-data science as a distinct subdiscipline of data science? To identify a respective research agenda and to structure the research questions, we conduct a case study from the domain of materials science. One insight that simulation data may be different from other data regarding its structure and quality, which entails focal points different from the ones of conventional data-analysis projects. It also turns out that interpretability and usability are important notions in our context as well. More attention is needed to gather the various meanings of these terms to align them with the needs and priorities of domain scientists. Finally, we propose extensions to our case study which we deem necessary to generalize our insights towards the guidelines envisioned for simulation-data science.","PeriodicalId":208455,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2018.00058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Simulations let scientists study properties of complex systems. At first sight, data mining is a good choice when evaluating large numbers of simulations. But it is currently unclear whether there are general principles that might guide the deployment of respective methods to simulation data. In other words, is it worthwhile to target at simulation-data science as a distinct subdiscipline of data science? To identify a respective research agenda and to structure the research questions, we conduct a case study from the domain of materials science. One insight that simulation data may be different from other data regarding its structure and quality, which entails focal points different from the ones of conventional data-analysis projects. It also turns out that interpretability and usability are important notions in our context as well. More attention is needed to gather the various meanings of these terms to align them with the needs and priorities of domain scientists. Finally, we propose extensions to our case study which we deem necessary to generalize our insights towards the guidelines envisioned for simulation-data science.
迈向模拟-数据科学-材料失效案例研究
模拟可以让科学家研究复杂系统的特性。乍一看,在评估大量模拟时,数据挖掘是一个不错的选择。但目前尚不清楚是否存在指导各自模拟数据方法部署的一般原则。换句话说,是否值得将模拟数据科学作为数据科学的一个独特的分支学科?为了确定各自的研究议程并构建研究问题,我们从材料科学领域进行了案例研究。模拟数据在结构和质量方面可能与其他数据不同,这需要与传统数据分析项目不同的焦点。可解释性和可用性在我们的语境中也是很重要的概念。需要更多的注意力来收集这些术语的各种含义,以使它们与领域科学家的需求和优先级保持一致。最后,我们提出了对我们的案例研究的扩展,我们认为有必要将我们对模拟数据科学设想的指导方针的见解概括起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信