A. Jiménez‐Valverde, Y. Nakazawa, A. Lira‐Noriega, A. Townsend Peterson
{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATION STRUCTURE AND ECOLOGICAL NICHE MODEL PROJECTIONS","authors":"A. Jiménez‐Valverde, Y. Nakazawa, A. Lira‐Noriega, A. Townsend Peterson","doi":"10.17161/BI.V6I1.1634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environmental causation of species' distributions depends on three general, interacting types of factors: the abiotic (or physical) environment, the biotic environment, and accessibility of areas across complex landscapes (Pulliam 2000; Soberón and Peterson 2005; Soberón 2007). Indirect variables, such as elevation, are those associated with the presence of species owing to correlation with the actual variables that directly and causally affect the fitness of the species, such as temperature or precipitation (Austin 2002). Put another way, variables can be arranged along a gradient of proximal to distal, regarding the immediacy of causality regarding the fitness of the species: indirect variables are always distal variables (Austin 2002). Contrary to proximal variables, distal variables are often easy measurable, and thus available in georeferenced databases (Fig. 1). Many researchers now attempt to reconstruct these environmental dimensions as ecological niche models (also termed \" bioclimatic envelopes, \" \" environmental niche models, \" or even \" species distribution models \"), using a variety of inferential approaches. Niche models have been used to predict geographic distributions of species (Guisan et al. 2006), anticipate distributions of unknown species (Raxworthy et al. 2003), estimate the invasive potential of species (Peterson 2003; Thuiller et al. 2005), and forecast climate change effects on species' distributions (Araújo et al. 2005). The predictive capacity of these approaches makes them particularly useful in applications involving \" transferring \" the niche model to make predictions regarding other landscapes or time periods (Araújo and Pearson 2005; Peterson et al. 2007). Such transferability applications, however, depend critically on the assumption that environmental variables relevant on one landscape or at one time will be relevant on another. Niche models are probably never based directly on genuinely proximate variables, but rather rely on more easily measurable variables that are inevitably less directly related to the population biology of the species in question. As such, the correlation structure among environmental variables becomes key (Morin and Lechowicz 2008): if correlation structures are stable and consistent across different landscapes and time periods, then niche models may be transferable to those other situations; if, on the other hand, correlation structures are not consistent among situations, then models may not be transferable, or at least not as fully or as readily. As correlation methods, niche modeling techniques simply select the set of variables that is best to explain the largest part of the variation in the dependent variable. Transferability exercises require the …","PeriodicalId":269455,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Informatics","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/BI.V6I1.1634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64
Abstract
The environmental causation of species' distributions depends on three general, interacting types of factors: the abiotic (or physical) environment, the biotic environment, and accessibility of areas across complex landscapes (Pulliam 2000; Soberón and Peterson 2005; Soberón 2007). Indirect variables, such as elevation, are those associated with the presence of species owing to correlation with the actual variables that directly and causally affect the fitness of the species, such as temperature or precipitation (Austin 2002). Put another way, variables can be arranged along a gradient of proximal to distal, regarding the immediacy of causality regarding the fitness of the species: indirect variables are always distal variables (Austin 2002). Contrary to proximal variables, distal variables are often easy measurable, and thus available in georeferenced databases (Fig. 1). Many researchers now attempt to reconstruct these environmental dimensions as ecological niche models (also termed " bioclimatic envelopes, " " environmental niche models, " or even " species distribution models "), using a variety of inferential approaches. Niche models have been used to predict geographic distributions of species (Guisan et al. 2006), anticipate distributions of unknown species (Raxworthy et al. 2003), estimate the invasive potential of species (Peterson 2003; Thuiller et al. 2005), and forecast climate change effects on species' distributions (Araújo et al. 2005). The predictive capacity of these approaches makes them particularly useful in applications involving " transferring " the niche model to make predictions regarding other landscapes or time periods (Araújo and Pearson 2005; Peterson et al. 2007). Such transferability applications, however, depend critically on the assumption that environmental variables relevant on one landscape or at one time will be relevant on another. Niche models are probably never based directly on genuinely proximate variables, but rather rely on more easily measurable variables that are inevitably less directly related to the population biology of the species in question. As such, the correlation structure among environmental variables becomes key (Morin and Lechowicz 2008): if correlation structures are stable and consistent across different landscapes and time periods, then niche models may be transferable to those other situations; if, on the other hand, correlation structures are not consistent among situations, then models may not be transferable, or at least not as fully or as readily. As correlation methods, niche modeling techniques simply select the set of variables that is best to explain the largest part of the variation in the dependent variable. Transferability exercises require the …
物种分布的环境原因取决于三种一般的、相互作用的因素类型:非生物(或物理)环境、生物环境和跨越复杂景观的区域的可达性(Pulliam 2000;Soberón and Peterson 2005;Soberon 2007)。间接变量,如海拔,是那些与物种存在相关的变量,因为它们与直接和因果影响物种适应度的实际变量相关,如温度或降水(Austin 2002)。换句话说,变量可以沿着近端到远端的梯度排列,考虑到物种适应度的因果关系的直接性:间接变量总是远端变量(Austin 2002)。与近端变量相反,远端变量通常很容易测量,因此可以在地理参考数据库中获得(图1)。许多研究人员现在尝试使用各种推断方法将这些环境维度重建为生态位模型(也称为“生物气候包络”、“环境生态位模型”甚至“物种分布模型”)。生态位模型已被用于预测物种的地理分布(Guisan et al. 2006),预测未知物种的分布(Raxworthy et al. 2003),估计物种的入侵潜力(Peterson 2003;Thuiller et al. 2005),并预测气候变化对物种分布的影响(Araújo et al. 2005)。这些方法的预测能力使它们在涉及“转移”利基模型以对其他景观或时间段进行预测的应用中特别有用(Araújo和Pearson 2005;Peterson et al. 2007)。然而,这种可转移性的应用主要取决于与一种景观有关的环境变量或在某一时刻将与另一种景观有关的假设。生态位模型可能永远不会直接基于真正接近的变量,而是依赖于更容易测量的变量,这些变量不可避免地与所讨论物种的种群生物学不太直接相关。因此,环境变量之间的相关结构成为关键(Morin and Lechowicz 2008):如果相关结构在不同的景观和时间段内是稳定和一致的,那么生态位模型可以转移到其他情况;另一方面,如果相关结构在不同的情况下不一致,那么模型可能无法转移,或者至少不完全或不容易转移。作为相关方法,生态位建模技术只是选择一组最能解释因变量中最大部分变化的变量。可转移性练习要求……