Challenging the United Kingdom's Decision not to Support the Resettlement of the Chagos Islands: R (on the application of Hoareau and Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2020] EWCA Civ 1010

C. Monaghan
{"title":"Challenging the United Kingdom's Decision not to Support the Resettlement of the Chagos Islands: R (on the application of Hoareau and Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2020] EWCA Civ 1010","authors":"C. Monaghan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1888514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The long-running Chagos litigation has now entered into its third decade with the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Hoareau and Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. The appeal was brought by Ms Solange Hoareau and Mr Louis Olivier Bancoult to challenge the Divisional Court’s earlier judgment. The appeal concerns a decision taken at the very highest level of government in 2016, which was to refuse to support the resettlement of the Chagossians to the British Indian Ocean Territory (‘the BIOT’). The Chagossians had originally been the inhabitants of the BIOT and many still wish to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago. Rather than supporting resettlement, the UK government offered the Chagossians about £40 million in compensation over the course of 10 years. The appeal was heard in May 2020 by Sir Terence Etherton MR, Green LJ and Dingemans LJ, and judgment was handed down on 30 July 2020.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1888514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. The long-running Chagos litigation has now entered into its third decade with the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Hoareau and Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. The appeal was brought by Ms Solange Hoareau and Mr Louis Olivier Bancoult to challenge the Divisional Court’s earlier judgment. The appeal concerns a decision taken at the very highest level of government in 2016, which was to refuse to support the resettlement of the Chagossians to the British Indian Ocean Territory (‘the BIOT’). The Chagossians had originally been the inhabitants of the BIOT and many still wish to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago. Rather than supporting resettlement, the UK government offered the Chagossians about £40 million in compensation over the course of 10 years. The appeal was heard in May 2020 by Sir Terence Etherton MR, Green LJ and Dingemans LJ, and judgment was handed down on 30 July 2020.
质疑英国不支持查戈斯群岛重新安置的决定:R(关于Hoareau和Bancoult的申请)诉外交和联邦事务大臣[2020]EWCA Civ 1010
1. 随着上诉法院在R (Hoareau and Bancoult)诉外交和联邦事务大臣一案中作出裁决,旷日持久的查戈斯群岛诉讼现已进入第三个十年。索兰吉·霍罗女士和路易斯·奥利维尔·班库尔先生提出上诉,对地方法院早些时候的判决提出质疑。该呼吁涉及2016年政府最高层作出的一项决定,即拒绝支持将查戈斯人重新安置到英属印度洋领土(“BIOT”)。查戈斯人最初是BIOT的居民,许多人仍然希望回到查戈斯群岛的外岛。英国政府没有支持重新安置,而是向查戈斯人提供了大约4000万英镑的赔偿金,为期10年。上诉于2020年5月由Terence Etherton先生,Green LJ和Dingemans LJ听取,并于2020年7月30日作出判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信