Role of Axial Stress in Pipeline Integrity Management

Ken Zhang, Ron Chune, Rick Wang, R. Kania
{"title":"Role of Axial Stress in Pipeline Integrity Management","authors":"Ken Zhang, Ron Chune, Rick Wang, R. Kania","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In pipeline integrity management, axial stress solely can be a detrimental condition, and it may play an important role in assessment of other threats. Current practice for the assessment of integrity features such as external metal loss, deformation and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) are based on methods validated by burst testing that primarily consider hoop stress to be the maximum principal stress which governs. Observations during recent integrity management practice, however, indicate that axial stress plays an important role in pipeline failures when interacting with integrity features under certain circumstances, and should be carefully considered in integrity engineering assessment.\n Multiple real-life case studies are described to illustrate the importance of proper consideration of axial stress in integrity management, including: 1) axial compressive stress induced global buckling, 2) yielding of small radius fitting under axial stress, 3) ductile overloading due to axial tensile stress interacting with circumferentially oriented corrosion feature, 4) axial tensile stress and its relationship with formation of circumferential stress corrosion cracking. The details of the case studies, results and findings are summarized in this paper.\n Determining axial stress for integrity assessment can be critical, depending on site-specific conditions and nature of the loading. In this paper, a multi-level method for calculating axial stress based on finite element analysis (FEA) using various elements and techniques, combined with bending strain measured by in-line inspection (ILI) is described. In addition, a simplified approach for interacting threat analysis with continuum FEA and a simplified assessment based on empirical equations are proposed and discussed.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pipeline integrity management, axial stress solely can be a detrimental condition, and it may play an important role in assessment of other threats. Current practice for the assessment of integrity features such as external metal loss, deformation and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) are based on methods validated by burst testing that primarily consider hoop stress to be the maximum principal stress which governs. Observations during recent integrity management practice, however, indicate that axial stress plays an important role in pipeline failures when interacting with integrity features under certain circumstances, and should be carefully considered in integrity engineering assessment. Multiple real-life case studies are described to illustrate the importance of proper consideration of axial stress in integrity management, including: 1) axial compressive stress induced global buckling, 2) yielding of small radius fitting under axial stress, 3) ductile overloading due to axial tensile stress interacting with circumferentially oriented corrosion feature, 4) axial tensile stress and its relationship with formation of circumferential stress corrosion cracking. The details of the case studies, results and findings are summarized in this paper. Determining axial stress for integrity assessment can be critical, depending on site-specific conditions and nature of the loading. In this paper, a multi-level method for calculating axial stress based on finite element analysis (FEA) using various elements and techniques, combined with bending strain measured by in-line inspection (ILI) is described. In addition, a simplified approach for interacting threat analysis with continuum FEA and a simplified assessment based on empirical equations are proposed and discussed.
轴向应力在管道完整性管理中的作用
在管道完整性管理中,轴向应力可能只是一个不利条件,它可能在评估其他威胁方面发挥重要作用。目前评估完整性特征(如外部金属损失、变形和应力腐蚀开裂(SCC))的实践是基于爆裂测试验证的方法,主要考虑环向应力是控制的最大主应力。然而,在最近的完整性管理实践中观察到,在某些情况下,当轴向应力与完整性特征相互作用时,轴向应力在管道失效中起着重要作用,在完整性工程评估中应仔细考虑。本文描述了多个实际案例,以说明在完整性管理中适当考虑轴向应力的重要性,包括:1)轴向压应力引起的整体屈曲,2)轴向应力下小半径拟合的屈服,3)轴向拉应力与周向取向腐蚀特征相互作用导致的延性超载,4)轴向拉应力及其与周向应力腐蚀裂纹形成的关系。本文对案例研究的细节、结果和发现进行了总结。根据具体的场地条件和载荷的性质,确定轴向应力以进行完整性评估是至关重要的。本文介绍了一种基于有限元分析(FEA)的多级轴向应力计算方法,该方法采用多种单元和技术,结合在线检测(ILI)测量的弯曲应变。此外,提出并讨论了一种简化的连续体有限元相互作用威胁分析方法和基于经验方程的简化评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信