{"title":"Hypermeter","authors":"Danuta Mirka","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197548905.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter unearths a number of cues that point to eighteenth-century recognition of what today is called hypermeter and retraces the line of tradition that led from eighteenth-century music theory to the emergence of the modern concept of hypermeter in the twentieth century. It departs from the eighteenth-century concept of compound meter, related to hypermeter by some modern authors, and from the analogy between measures and phrases posited by Johann Philipp Kirnberger and Johann Abraham Peter Schulz in Johann Georg Sulzer’s Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste (1771–74). While compound meter proves irrelevant for the development of hypermeter, the analogy between measures and phrases, adopted by Gottfried Weber in his Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst (1817) and further refined by German music theorists, provides the point of departure for the development of the concept of hypermeter in American music theory. The further course of the chapter traces more recent history of this concept. It evaluates the contribution of Schenkerian theory and the cognitive study of music, and it introduces a dynamic model of hypermeter as an extension of the dynamic model of meter presented by the author in Metric Manipulations in Haydn and Mozart (2009).","PeriodicalId":376465,"journal":{"name":"Hypermetric Manipulations in Haydn and Mozart","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypermetric Manipulations in Haydn and Mozart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197548905.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter unearths a number of cues that point to eighteenth-century recognition of what today is called hypermeter and retraces the line of tradition that led from eighteenth-century music theory to the emergence of the modern concept of hypermeter in the twentieth century. It departs from the eighteenth-century concept of compound meter, related to hypermeter by some modern authors, and from the analogy between measures and phrases posited by Johann Philipp Kirnberger and Johann Abraham Peter Schulz in Johann Georg Sulzer’s Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste (1771–74). While compound meter proves irrelevant for the development of hypermeter, the analogy between measures and phrases, adopted by Gottfried Weber in his Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst (1817) and further refined by German music theorists, provides the point of departure for the development of the concept of hypermeter in American music theory. The further course of the chapter traces more recent history of this concept. It evaluates the contribution of Schenkerian theory and the cognitive study of music, and it introduces a dynamic model of hypermeter as an extension of the dynamic model of meter presented by the author in Metric Manipulations in Haydn and Mozart (2009).
本章揭示了一些线索,这些线索指向18世纪对今天所谓的超拍子的认识,并追溯了从18世纪音乐理论到20世纪现代超拍子概念出现的传统路线。它偏离了18世纪的复合拍子概念,一些现代作家将其与超拍子联系起来,也偏离了约翰·菲利普·柯恩伯格和约翰·亚伯拉罕·彼得·舒尔茨在约翰·乔治·苏尔泽的《schönen k nste理论总论》(1771-74)中对小节和短语的类比。虽然复合拍子被证明与高速拍子的发展无关,但戈特弗里德·韦伯(Gottfried Weber)在他的《Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst》(1817)中采用的小节和乐句之间的类比,并由德国音乐理论家进一步完善,为美国音乐理论中高速拍子概念的发展提供了起点。本章的进一步内容追溯了这一概念的近代史。它评估了申克理论和音乐认知研究的贡献,并介绍了超拍子的动态模型,作为作者在海顿和莫扎特的韵律操纵(2009)中提出的动态拍子模型的扩展。