The Juridical Analysis of Notary/PPAT Responsibilities who Do Not Pay BPHTB Tax

Eko Kurniawan, Widhi Handoko, Achmad Arifullah
{"title":"The Juridical Analysis of Notary/PPAT Responsibilities who Do Not Pay BPHTB Tax","authors":"Eko Kurniawan, Widhi Handoko, Achmad Arifullah","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.2.498-506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the potential sources of tax revenue that needs to be explored according to the current economic situation and condition as well as the development of the nation is the type of Customs Tax on Land and Building Rights, hereinafter abbreviated as BPHTB. The transfer of rights to land and buildings can occur due to a legal act or legal event. One of the legal actions that can cause the transfer of rights to land and buildings is through buying and selling. The existence of the transfer of rights must be proven by an authentic deed made by or before the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT). The transfer of rights to land and buildings through the sale and purchase gives rise to tax obligations for the parties, namely Income Tax (PPh) for the seller and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) for the buyer. The purpose of this paper is to describe the legality of the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) as a public official and the juridical implications of PPAT who receive the custody of Income Tax (PPh) and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) from taxpayers. The method used to examine these problems is normative legal research using a statute approach to examine the laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The legality of the act of receiving the power to pay taxes by PPAT as a public official actually does not yet exist, in other words, a definite rule has not been established that regulates the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by PPAT. Then regarding the juridical implications of PPAT who receive PPh and BPHTB tax deposits from taxpayers, even though the act does not have legal legality, its implementation is still included in the legal category because the act departs from the habits that have been in effect so far and is accepted by the community. As long as there is no legal regulation to realize the legality of this act, during that time this habit will continue, although there is no guarantee of legal protection for this act, but as long as it does not cause harm to anyone, it is considered not a problem. The BPHTB fee entrusted by the client to the Notary as the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT), allows for opportunities for fraud by not paying or embezzling the BPHTB funds deposited. The results show that the deed of sale and purchase that has been made by PPAT is valid even though the taxes arising from the transfer of rights to the land and buildings have not been paid. Parties who do not pay taxes arising from the transfer of land and building rights have debts to the state and may be subject to administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.498-506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the potential sources of tax revenue that needs to be explored according to the current economic situation and condition as well as the development of the nation is the type of Customs Tax on Land and Building Rights, hereinafter abbreviated as BPHTB. The transfer of rights to land and buildings can occur due to a legal act or legal event. One of the legal actions that can cause the transfer of rights to land and buildings is through buying and selling. The existence of the transfer of rights must be proven by an authentic deed made by or before the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT). The transfer of rights to land and buildings through the sale and purchase gives rise to tax obligations for the parties, namely Income Tax (PPh) for the seller and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) for the buyer. The purpose of this paper is to describe the legality of the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) as a public official and the juridical implications of PPAT who receive the custody of Income Tax (PPh) and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) from taxpayers. The method used to examine these problems is normative legal research using a statute approach to examine the laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The legality of the act of receiving the power to pay taxes by PPAT as a public official actually does not yet exist, in other words, a definite rule has not been established that regulates the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by PPAT. Then regarding the juridical implications of PPAT who receive PPh and BPHTB tax deposits from taxpayers, even though the act does not have legal legality, its implementation is still included in the legal category because the act departs from the habits that have been in effect so far and is accepted by the community. As long as there is no legal regulation to realize the legality of this act, during that time this habit will continue, although there is no guarantee of legal protection for this act, but as long as it does not cause harm to anyone, it is considered not a problem. The BPHTB fee entrusted by the client to the Notary as the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT), allows for opportunities for fraud by not paying or embezzling the BPHTB funds deposited. The results show that the deed of sale and purchase that has been made by PPAT is valid even though the taxes arising from the transfer of rights to the land and buildings have not been paid. Parties who do not pay taxes arising from the transfer of land and building rights have debts to the state and may be subject to administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws.
公证员/PPAT责任不缴纳BPHTB税的法律分析
根据我国目前的经济形势和经济条件以及国家的发展情况,需要探索的潜在税收来源之一是土地和建筑权利关税类型,以下简称BPHTB。土地和建筑物权利的转让可以由于法律行为或法律事件而发生。导致土地和建筑物权利转移的法律行为之一是通过买卖。权利转让的存在必须由土地契约制定官员(PPAT)或之前制定的真实契约证明。通过买卖转让土地和建筑物的权利会给双方带来税收义务,即卖方的所得税(PPh)和买方的土地和建筑物权利取得海关(BPHTB)。本文的目的是描述土地契据官员(PPAT)作为公职人员接受存税权力的行为的合法性,以及PPAT从纳税人那里获得所得税(PPh)和取得土地和建筑权利(BPHTB)的海关保管的法律含义。用于审查这些问题的方法是规范性法律研究,使用成文法的方法来审查与所研究的法律问题有关的法律和条例。PPAT作为公职人员接受纳税权力行为的合法性实际上还不存在,也就是说,还没有建立一个明确的规则来规范PPAT接受纳税权力的行为。那么关于PPAT收取纳税人PPh和BPHTB的税收保证金的法律含义,尽管该法案不具有法律合法性,但其实施仍被纳入法律范畴,因为该法案偏离了迄今为止一直有效的习惯,并为社会所接受。只要没有法律规定来实现这种行为的合法性,在这段时间内,这种习惯就会继续存在,虽然这种行为没有法律保护的保证,但只要它不对任何人造成伤害,就不会被认为是一个问题。客户将BPHTB费用委托给公证员作为土地契据签发官(PPAT),这就为不支付或挪用BPHTB存款提供了欺诈的机会。结果表明,即使没有缴纳土地和建筑物的转让税,PPAT签订的买卖契约仍然有效。因土地、建筑权利转让所产生的税款不纳税的,有对国家的债务,可以依照有关法律的规定给予行政处分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信